These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24134909)

  • 1. Invalidating human gene patenting: the U.S. Supreme Court rules in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics.
    Kalyvas J; Little AS
    World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):680-1. PubMed ID: 24134909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The History of Patenting Genetic Material.
    Sherkow JS; Greely HT
    Annu Rev Genet; 2015; 49():161-82. PubMed ID: 26442843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene patenting--is the pendulum swinging back?
    Kesselheim AS; Mello MM
    N Engl J Med; 2010 May; 362(20):1855-8. PubMed ID: 20375396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene patents, patenting life and the impact of court rulings on US stem cell patents and research.
    Matthews KR; Cuchiara ML
    Regen Med; 2014 Mar; 9(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 24750060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case.
    Sklan A
    Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Sep; 2(5):581. PubMed ID: 24237164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court, process patents, and medical innovation.
    Kesselheim AS
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(24):2303-6. PubMed ID: 19923562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenging gene patents. Myriad ruling will impact personalized medicine.
    Lee J
    Mod Healthc; 2013 Apr; 43(15):8-9. PubMed ID: 23738477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patenting a living microbial cell: 40th anniversary of US Supreme Court decision Diamond versus Chakrabarty.
    Silver S
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2020 Jul; 367(13):. PubMed ID: 32501475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical-process patents--monopolizing the delivery of health care.
    Kesselheim AS; Mello MM
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Nov; 355(19):2036-41. PubMed ID: 17093256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patenting genes: what does Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics mean for genetic testing and research?
    Cartwright-Smith L
    Public Health Rep; 2014 May; 129(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 24790252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not quite a myriad of gene patents.
    Graff GD; Phillips D; Lei Z; Oh S; Nottenburg C; Pardey PG
    Nat Biotechnol; 2013 May; 31(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 23657391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of gene patents and the implications for medicine.
    Sherkow JS; Greely HT
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Sep; 173(17):1569-70. PubMed ID: 23896757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of Myriad and Mayo: will advancements in the biological sciences be spurred or disincentivized? (Or was biotech patenting not complicated enough?).
    Gordon J
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2014 Dec; 5(5):a020917. PubMed ID: 25502748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court of the United States syllabus. Association for Molecular Pathology et ál. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al. certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2013; (38):217-9. PubMed ID: 24340833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supreme Court to Myriad Genetics: Synthetic DNA is Patentable but Isolated Genes Are Not.
    Weinmeyer R; Klusty T
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Sep; 17(9):849-53. PubMed ID: 26390207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Take off your genes and let the doctor have a look: why the Mayo and Myriad decisions have invalidated method claims for genetic diagnostic testing.
    Bergin C
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2013; 63(1):173-217. PubMed ID: 25335200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene patents remain controversial in biomedical research.
    Arnold C
    Lancet; 2013 Aug; 382(9891):495-6. PubMed ID: 23940849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Elusive Right to Health Care under U.S. Law.
    Ruger JP; Ruger TW; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Jun; 372(26):2558-63. PubMed ID: 26107056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baseball bats and chocolate chip cookies: the judicial treatment of DNA in the myriad genetics litigation.
    Binnie I; Park-Thompson V
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2014 Dec; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 25524722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ADA and the Supreme Court: a mixed record.
    Bagenstos SR
    JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(22):2217-8. PubMed ID: 26057276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.