128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24135001)
1. Carbon plate shows even distribution of stress, decreases screw loosening, and increases recovery of preoperative daily feed intake amount in a rabbit model of mandibular continuity defects.
Lee SW; György S; Choi JB; Choi JY; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24135001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.
Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.
Bujtár P; Simonovics J; Váradi K; Sándor GK; Avery CM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Neck Screw and Conventional Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Condyle Fractures Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Conci RA; Tomazi FH; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; Fritscher GG; Heitz C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1321-7. PubMed ID: 25869984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.
Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling.
Markwardt J; Pfeifer G; Eckelt U; Reitemeier B
Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 17341898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel hybrid reconstruction plate for mandible segmental defects: A finite element analysis and fatigue testing.
Wu CH; Lin YS; Liu YS; Lin CL
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1671-1680. PubMed ID: 28838835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental biomechanical study of the primary stability of different osteosynthesis systems for mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.
Grohmann I; Raith S; Kesting M; Rau A; Mücke T; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Steiner T
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):942-7. PubMed ID: 23958348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Custom Implant for Reconstruction of Mandibular Continuity Defect.
Lee SW; Kim HG; Ham MJ; Hong DGK; Kim SG; Rotaru H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 76(6):1370-1376. PubMed ID: 29294354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prototyped grafting plate for reconstruction of mandibular defects.
Zhou L; Wang P; Han H; Li B; Wang H; Wang G; Zhao J; Liu Y; Wu W
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 25008032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of different angle-stable locking plate systems for mandibular surgery.
Lieger O; Schaller B; Bürki A; Büchler P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1589-94. PubMed ID: 26297419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of a curvilinear distractor device for correcting mandibular symphyseal defects.
Zhao L; Shang H; Chen X; Liu Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1158-67. PubMed ID: 24388177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.
Chang YW; Liu PH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3167-70. PubMed ID: 24110400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical design optimization of bioabsorbable fixation devices for bone fractures.
Lovald ST; Khraishi T; Wagner J; Baack B
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 19242363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical stress in plates for bridging reconstruction mandibular defects and purposes of double plate reinforcement.
Hoefert S; Taier R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 29567342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of locking and non-locking reconstruction plate-screw system in lateral mandibular defects by finite element analysis.
Muftuoglu G; Bayram B; Aydin P
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):e65-e69. PubMed ID: 33161169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 2: finite element analysis of endoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible.
Wong RC; Tideman H; Merkx MA; Jansen J; Goh SM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e487-97. PubMed ID: 22516866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular reconstruction system reliability analysis using probabilistic finite element method.
Kargarnejad S; Ghalichi F; Pourgol-Mohammad M; Garajei A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Oct; 24(13):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 34657530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
