These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24135099)

  • 1. The effects of operating parameters on spiramycin removal by nanofiltration membrane.
    Zhao C; Fan W; Wang T; Hou D; Luan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1512-9. PubMed ID: 24135099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes.
    Kumar R; Pal P
    Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 23789574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of landfill leachates by nanofiltration.
    Chaudhari LB; Murthy ZV
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1209-17. PubMed ID: 20149518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
    Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes.
    Leo CP; Chai WK; Mohammad AW; Qi Y; Hoedley AF; Chai SP
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 22053475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of calcium ions on the removal of haloacetic acids from swimming pool water by nanofiltration: mechanisms and implications.
    Yang L; Zhou J; She Q; Wan MP; Wang R; Chang VW; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():332-341. PubMed ID: 28063295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Researches on factors affecting the removal of carbamazepine by nanofiltration membranes].
    Huang Y; Zhang H; Dong BZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 32(3):705-10. PubMed ID: 21634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of heavy metals from aluminum anodic oxidation wastewaters by membrane filtration.
    Ates N; Uzal N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):22259-22272. PubMed ID: 29804256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration.
    Figoli A; Cassano A; Criscuoli A; Mozumder MS; Uddin MT; Islam MA; Drioli E
    Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19781734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
    Gong YW; Zhang HX; Cheng XN
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the performance of various nanofiltration membranes in advanced oxidation-nanofiltration treatment of reverse osmosis concentrates.
    Li N; Wang X; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Ding J; Lu J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(17):17472-17481. PubMed ID: 31020525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of pre-treatment methods on membrane flux, COD, and total phenol removal efficiencies for membrane treatment of pistachio wastewater.
    Ozay Y; Dizge N
    J Environ Manage; 2022 May; 310():114762. PubMed ID: 35220102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fate of organic pollutants in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor-nanofiltration membrane system at high water yield in antibiotic wastewater treatment.
    Wang J; Wei Y; Li K; Cheng Y; Li M; Xu J
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(4):876-81. PubMed ID: 24569290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.