These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24135156)

  • 1. Is morphokinetic analysis the answer?
    Aparicio B; Cruz M; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Dec; 27(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 24135156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of morphokinetic as a predictor of implantation.
    Tejera A; Aparicio-Ruiz B; Meseguer M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 28643503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment.
    Kirkegaard K; Agerholm IE; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod; 2012 May; 27(5):1277-85. PubMed ID: 22419744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-lapse embryo imaging and morphokinetic profiling: Towards a general characterisation of embryogenesis.
    Mandawala AA; Harvey SC; Roy TK; Fowler KE
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Nov; 174():2-10. PubMed ID: 27720247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development.
    Milewski R; Kuć P; Kuczyńska A; Stankiewicz B; Łukaszuk K; Kuczyński W
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Apr; 32(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 25690157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics.
    Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1030-4. PubMed ID: 23395415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research.
    Wong C; Chen AA; Behr B; Shen S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Feb; 26(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 23273754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Does embryo morphology constitute a reliable criterion for embryo selection?].
    Scalici E; Gala A; Ferrières A; Vincens C; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Sep; 42(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 25153441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Conaghan J; Chen AA; Willman SP; Ivani K; Chenette PE; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Gvakharia M; Loewke KE; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):412-9.e5. PubMed ID: 23721712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model.
    Cruz M; Garrido N; Gadea B; Muñoz M; Pérez-Cano I; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 23953584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence.
    Machtinger R; Racowsky C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Mar; 26(3):210-21. PubMed ID: 23352813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New approaches to embryo selection.
    Montag M; Toth B; Strowitzki T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Nov; 27(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 23933036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A time to look back: analysis of morphokinetic characteristics of human embryo development.
    Herrero J; Tejera A; Albert C; Vidal C; de los Santos MJ; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1602-9.e1-4. PubMed ID: 24083877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a relationship between time-lapse parameters and embryo sex?
    Bronet F; Nogales MC; Martínez E; Ariza M; Rubio C; García-Velasco JA; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):396-401.e2. PubMed ID: 25487751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes.
    Basile N; Morbeck D; García-Velasco J; Bronet F; Meseguer M
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 23315059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study.
    VerMilyea MD; Tan L; Anthony JT; Conaghan J; Ivani K; Gvakharia M; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Suraj V; Chen AA; Mainigi M; Coutifaris C; Shen S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Dec; 29(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 25444507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of embryo morphokinetics after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in smoking and nonsmoking women.
    Fréour T; Dessolle L; Lammers J; Lattes S; Barrière P
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1944-50. PubMed ID: 23465820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-lapse embryo imaging technology: does it improve the clinical results?
    Findikli N; Oral E
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 26(3):138-44. PubMed ID: 24752001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which morphological scoring system is relevant in human embryo development?
    Montag M; Liebenthron J; Köster M
    Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S252-6. PubMed ID: 21782239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of factors influencing morphokinetic characteristics of embryos in ART cycles.
    Gryshchenko MG; Pravdyuk AI; Parashchyuk VY
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Oct; 30 Suppl 1():6-8. PubMed ID: 25200818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.