These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24135323)

  • 1. OCT versus IVUS: accuracy versus clinical utility.
    Maehara A; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1105-1107. PubMed ID: 24135323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
    Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.
    Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-vessel coronary artery disease evaluation by multimodality imaging with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) plus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).
    Fabris E; Kilic ID; Caiazzo G; Serdoz R; Sinagra G; Di Mario C
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 180():21-9. PubMed ID: 25438201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
    Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical coherence tomography is a kid on the block: I would choose intravascular ultrasound.
    Dash D
    Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28648442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different findings in a calcified nodule between histology and intravascular imaging such as intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and coronary angioscopy.
    Hao H; Fujii K; Shibuya M; Imanaka T; Kawakami R; Hatakeyama K; Asada Y; Masuyama T; Hirota S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):937-8. PubMed ID: 25147041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
    Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound imaging in patients undergoing coronary interventions for stent thrombosis.
    Alfonso F; Dutary J; Paulo M; Gonzalo N; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Escaned J; Bañuelos C; Hernández R; Macaya C
    Heart; 2012 Aug; 98(16):1213-20. PubMed ID: 22826559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Review of the Clinical Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography in the Assessment and Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Matthews SD; Frishman WH
    Cardiol Rev; 2017; 25(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 28099219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
    D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
    Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Offline fusion of co-registered intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography images for the analysis of human atherosclerotic plaques.
    Räber L; Heo JH; Radu MD; Garcia-Garcia HM; Stefanini GG; Moschovitis A; Dijkstra J; Kelbaek H; Windecker S; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2012 May; 8(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 22580254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images for tissue characterization of human coronary plaques.
    Kawasaki M; Bouma BE; Bressner J; Houser SL; Nadkarni SK; MacNeill BD; Jang IK; Fujiwara H; Tearney GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 48(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 16814652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.