823 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24135382)
21. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?
Rowe CK; Pierce MW; Tecci KC; Houck CS; Mandell J; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):871-7. PubMed ID: 22283146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center: an update in gynecologic oncological field.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Pirovano C; Gaetani M; Youssef A
Updates Surg; 2017 Dec; 69(4):517-522. PubMed ID: 28508348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies.
Sarlos D; Kots LA
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 23(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 21666467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomies.
Behera MA; Likes CE; Judd JP; Barnett JC; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 22100443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Ibáñez B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Gómez X; Colás E; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera-Díaz S; Puig-Puig O; Magrina JF; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 24231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.
Pasic RP; Rizzo JA; Fang H; Ross S; Moore M; Gunnarsson C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 20850391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-analysis comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) vs open RC.
Lee R; Chughtai B; Herman M; Shariat SF; Scherr DS
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):976-83. PubMed ID: 21917100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Bandera CA; Magrina JF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
