These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24135584)

  • 21. Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I-Dust.
    David B; Moe RO; Michel V; Lund V; Mejdell C
    Animals (Basel); 2015 Jul; 5(3):495-511. PubMed ID: 26479370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Occupational exposure of poultry stockmen in current barn systems for egg production in the United Kingdom.
    Whyte RT
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Jul; 43(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 12195795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dust levels and control methods in poultry houses.
    Ellen HH; Bottcher RW; von Wachenfelt E; Takai H
    J Agric Saf Health; 2000 Nov; 6(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11217692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cross-sectional study on feather cover damage in Canadian laying hens in non-cage housing systems.
    Decina C; Berke O; van Staaveren N; Baes CF; Widowski TM; Harlander-Matauschek A
    BMC Vet Res; 2019 Dec; 15(1):435. PubMed ID: 31796015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations.
    Just N; Kirychuk S; Gilbert Y; Létourneau V; Veillette M; Singh B; Duchaine C
    Environ Res; 2011 May; 111(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 21288509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens.
    Heerkens JL; Delezie E; Kempen I; Zoons J; Ampe B; Rodenburg TB; Tuyttens FA
    Poult Sci; 2015 Sep; 94(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 26188031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Endotoxin concentration in modern animal houses in southern Bavaria.
    Schierl R; Heise A; Egger U; Schneider F; Eichelser R; Neser S; Nowak D
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2007; 14(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 17655190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of different litter substrates and induced molt on production performance and welfare quality parameters of white Leghorn hens housed in multi-tiered aviary system.
    Regmi P; Robison CI; Jones DR; Gast RK; Tempelman RJ; Karcher DM
    Poult Sci; 2018 Oct; 97(10):3397-3404. PubMed ID: 29878244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada.
    Petrik MT; Guerin MT; Widowski TM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Apr; 94(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 25713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal and spatial distributions of aerial contaminants in an enclosed pig building in winter.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Lee KJ; Park JB; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 16194664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Description of Laying Hen Husbandry and Management Practices in Canada.
    van Staaveren N; Decina C; Baes CF; Widowski TM; Berke O; Harlander-Matauschek A
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 29997334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.
    Ali AB; Campbell DL; Karcher DM; Siegford JM
    Poult Sci; 2016 Nov; 95(11):2489-2502. PubMed ID: 27444438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses.
    Chang CW; Chung H; Huang CF; Su HJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Aug; 45(6):457-65. PubMed ID: 11513795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dust-bathing behavior of laying hens in enriched colony housing systems and an aviary system.
    Louton H; Bergmann S; Reese S; Erhard MH; Rauch E
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1482-1491. PubMed ID: 27044875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.
    Shepherd TA; Zhao Y; Li H; Stinn JP; Hayes MD; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 25737568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.
    Duchaine C; Grimard Y; Cormier Y
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10772615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Behaviour of laying hens in aviaries--review. Part 2: Feeding behaviour, reproductive and dust bathing behaviour of chickens].
    Moesta A; Briese A; Knierim U; Hartung J
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2008 Jan; 115(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 18265752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fungal and endotoxin measurements in dust associated with respiratory symptoms in a water-damaged office building.
    Park JH; Cox-Ganser J; Rao C; Kreiss K
    Indoor Air; 2006 Jun; 16(3):192-203. PubMed ID: 16683938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The utilization of the Welfare Quality® assessment for determining laying hen condition across three housing systems.
    Blatchford RA; Fulton RM; Mench JA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jan; 95(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 26240396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of ventilation rate on gradient of aerial contaminants in the confinement pig building.
    Kim KY; Ko HJ; Kim HT; Kim YS; Roh YM; Kim CN
    Environ Res; 2007 Mar; 103(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17184767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.