These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24136675)

  • 1. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review.
    Hmaidouch R; Weigl P
    Int J Oral Sci; 2013 Dec; 5(4):183-90. PubMed ID: 24136675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antagonist enamel tooth wear produced by different dental ceramic systems: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
    Mao Z; Beuer F; Hey J; Schmidt F; Sorensen JA; Prause E
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104832. PubMed ID: 38211687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review.
    Gou M; Chen H; Kang J; Wang H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 30509545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo study.
    Etman MK; Woolford M; Dunne S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 18548965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 17720238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative reliability analyses of zirconium oxide and lithium disilicate restorations in vitro and in vivo.
    Silva NR; Thompson VP; Valverde GB; Coelho PG; Powers JM; Farah JW; Esquivel-Upshaw J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Apr; 142 Suppl 2():4S-9S. PubMed ID: 21454834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns.
    Mundhe K; Jain V; Pruthi G; Shah N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 25985742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
    Etman MK; Woolford MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Wear Of Enamel Antagonist To Monolithic Zirconia And Metal-Ceramic Crowns.
    Deval P; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Chauhan M; Jaiswal N; Tiwari DK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):744–751. PubMed ID: 33750998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three years in vivo wear: core-ceramic, veneers, and enamel antagonists.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Rose WF; Barrett AA; Oliveira ER; Yang MC; Clark AE; Anusavice KJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jun; 28(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 22410113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced wear of enamel with novel fine and nano-scale leucite glass-ceramics.
    Theocharopoulos A; Chen X; Hill R; Cattell MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Jun; 41(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 23438418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of bilayer ceramic and metal-ceramic crown performance.
    Esquivel-Upshaw J; Rose W; Oliveira E; Yang M; Clark AE; Anusavice K
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Apr; 22(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 22978697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of human enamel wear against four dental ceramics and gold.
    al-Hiyasat AS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):487-95. PubMed ID: 9699442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of antagonist enamel wear opposing full-coverage zirconia crowns versus other ceramics full-coverage crowns and natural enamel - An umbrella review.
    Shah N; Nerkar H; Badwaik P; Ahuja B; Malu R; Bhanushali N
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jul; 24(3):217-224. PubMed ID: 38946503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).
    Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE
    Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review.
    Takeichi T; Katsoulis J; Blatz MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):455-61. PubMed ID: 24169079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occlusal wear of metal-free ceramic-filled polymer crowns after 2 years in service.
    Stober T; Dreyhaupt J; Lehnung U; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 18546773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.