BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24136688)

  • 1. Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients.
    Kusy M; Obrzut B; Kluska J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1357-65. PubMed ID: 24136688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods.
    Obrzut B; Kusy M; Semczuk A; Obrzut M; Kluska J
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):840. PubMed ID: 29233120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
    Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lung cancer prediction from microarray data by gene expression programming.
    Azzawi H; Hou J; Xiang Y; Alanni R
    IET Syst Biol; 2016 Oct; 10(5):168-178. PubMed ID: 27762231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective assessment of urinary and bowel symptoms, and sexual function between laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy.
    Dogan NU; Kohler C; Pfiffer T; Plaikner A; Le X; Favero G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Mar; 31(3):484-489. PubMed ID: 33649018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.
    Park SH; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Sep; 18(1):908. PubMed ID: 30241512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thirty-day Postoperative Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive versus Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
    Kohut AY; Kuhn T; Conrad LB; Chua KJ; Abuelafiya M; Gordon AN; Flowers L; Orfanelli T; Blank S; Khanna N
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):840-847. PubMed ID: 35405331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-enabled prediction using probabilistic neural network classifiers.
    González-Camacho JM; Crossa J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Ornella L; Gianola D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():208. PubMed ID: 26956885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of multilayer perception artificial neutral networks for the prediction of the probability of malignancy in adnexal tumors].
    Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):855-62. PubMed ID: 14674136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements.
    Naik R; Jackson KS; Lopes A; Cross P; Henry JA
    BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 20236108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016.
    Liu P; Liang C; Lu A; Chen X; Liang W; Li D; Yin L; Li Z; Cao Y; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 32507516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clavien-Dindo classification and risk prediction model of complications after robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Ling H; Wang G; Yi B; Li Z; Zhu S
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):527-536. PubMed ID: 35913623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004-2015.
    Liang C; Liu P; Cui Z; Liang Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 156(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 31806399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
    Lin YS
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Feb; 10(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 12554999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.