BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24137041)

  • 1. A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).
    Pan H; Xie F; Liu P; Xia J; Ji Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24137041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.
    Xie F; Ji Y; Tremmel L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 22426247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel Bayesian seamless phase I/II design.
    Pan H; Huang P; Wang Z; Wang L; Li C; Xia J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73060. PubMed ID: 24023809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study.
    Rossoni C; Bardet A; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):635-644. PubMed ID: 31538815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
    Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.
    Koopmeiners JS; Modiano J
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology.
    Yada S; Hamada C
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Mar; 16(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 27892650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.
    Ji Y; Wang SJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 31(14):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23569307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials with nonignorable dropouts.
    Guo B; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1721-32. PubMed ID: 25626676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized dose-escalation designs for drug combination cancer trials with immunotherapy.
    Mozgunov P; Jaki T; Paoletti X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):359-377. PubMed ID: 30352007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SPIRIT: A seamless phase I/II randomized design for immunotherapy trials.
    Guo B; Li D; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):527-540. PubMed ID: 29882388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian seamless phase I-II trial design with two stages for cancer clinical trials with drug combinations.
    Jiménez JL; Kim S; Tighiouart M
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1300-1314. PubMed ID: 32150296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. uTPI: A utility-based toxicity probability interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials.
    Shi H; Cao J; Yuan Y; Lin R
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(11):2626-2649. PubMed ID: 33650708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A bivariate Bayesian dose-finding procedure applied to a seamless phase I/II trial in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Thygesen H; Dragalin V; Whitehead A; Whitehead J
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 23011957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
    Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.
    Richert L; Doussau A; Lelièvre JD; Arnold V; Rieux V; Bouakane A; Lévy Y; Chêne G; Thiébaut R;
    Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24571662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential monitoring of Phase I dose expansion cohorts.
    Iasonos A; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):204-214. PubMed ID: 26854196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.
    Wages NA; Tait C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):903-20. PubMed ID: 24904956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early phase trial design for assessing several dose levels for toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.
    Hoering A; Mitchell A; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 23529697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.