These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24137706)

  • 1. Compressed sampling for boundary measurements in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Javaherian A; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Sep; 34(9):1133-50. PubMed ID: 24137706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling of finite elements for sparse recovery in large scale 3D electrical impedance tomography.
    Javaherian A; Soleimani M; Moeller K
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jan; 36(1):43-66. PubMed ID: 25501046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
    Wagenaar J; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
    Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system for 3D continuous non-destructive monitoring of tissue culture.
    Lee EJ; Wi H; McEwan AL; Farooq A; Sohal H; Woo EJ; Seo JK; Oh TI
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Oct; 13():142. PubMed ID: 25286865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accelerated reconstruction of electrical impedance tomography images via patch based sparse representation.
    Wang Q; Lian Z; Wang J; Chen Q; Sun Y; Li X; Duan X; Cui Z; Wang H
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2016 Nov; 87(11):114707. PubMed ID: 27910465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing computational costs in large scale 3D EIT by using a sparse Jacobian matrix with block-wise CGLS reconstruction.
    Yang CL; Wei HY; Adler A; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 23719094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D EIT image reconstruction with GREIT.
    Grychtol B; Müller B; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):785-800. PubMed ID: 27203184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uniform background assumption produces misleading lung EIT images.
    Grychtol B; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):579-93. PubMed ID: 23718942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new algorithm to reconstruct EIT images: Node-Back-Projection Algorithm.
    Zhang J; Yan W; Xu G; Zhao Q
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4390-3. PubMed ID: 18002977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional image reconstruction for electrical impedance tomography.
    Kleinermann F; Avis NJ; Judah SK; Barber DC
    Physiol Meas; 1996 Nov; 17 Suppl 4A():A77-83. PubMed ID: 9001605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal distance of multi-plane sensor in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Hao Z; Yue S; Sun B; Wang H
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):326-338. PubMed ID: 29037075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient forward solver in electrical impedance tomography by spectral element method.
    Lim KH; Lee JH; Ye G; Liu QH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Aug; 25(8):1044-51. PubMed ID: 16894997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.