These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24138004)
1. The end of DNA patents in the United States? Webber P Expert Opin Ther Pat; 2013 Dec; 23(12):1525-7. PubMed ID: 24138004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. US Supreme Court may have to settle dispute over patenting DNA sequences. Dyer C BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6187. PubMed ID: 21952463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case. Sklan A Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Sep; 2(5):581. PubMed ID: 24237164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolated DNA patent ban creates muddy waters for biomarkers and natural products. Harrison C Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2013 Aug; 12(8):570-1. PubMed ID: 23903213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nature, nurture and DNA sequences. Ghosh S Pharm Pat Anal; 2014 Jan; 3(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 24354972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene patents, patenting life and the impact of court rulings on US stem cell patents and research. Matthews KR; Cuchiara ML Regen Med; 2014 Mar; 9(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 24750060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US Patent Office issues guidelines on natural product patent eligibility. Harrison C Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2014 Apr; 13(4):250. PubMed ID: 24687057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patent protection of diagnostic technology: will recent US Supreme Court decisions change patent strategy? Komatani TS Pharm Pat Anal; 2015; 4(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 26451906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are human genes patentable? The Supreme Court says yes and no. Golden JM; Sage WM Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1343-5. PubMed ID: 23918476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patent watch: US Supreme Court revises patent claim construction standards. Noonan K Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2015 Mar; 14(3):157. PubMed ID: 25722233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patent watch: Supreme Court decision impacts the strength of US patents. Brinckerhoff CC Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2016 Jul; 15(8):524. PubMed ID: 27469227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents. Robertson D Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Data disclosure crucial after DNA patent verdict. de Costa A Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6149):959. PubMed ID: 23990544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The unpatentable human being. Torrance AW Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 24092583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US Supreme Court hears arguments in case of BRCA1 and BRCA2 [corrected] patents. McCarthy M BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2446. PubMed ID: 23596230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patentability of genetically engineered microorganisms. Cooper A JAMA; 1983 Mar; 249(12):1553-4. PubMed ID: 6338261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intellectual property. What good is a patent? Supreme Court may suggest an answer. Kintisch E Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):946-7. PubMed ID: 16484470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Something more is necessary: are genes and genetic diagnostic tests statutory subject matter for US patents? Cockbain J; Sterckx S Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2011 Mar; 11(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 21405966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]