These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24138652)
1. Cost-effectiveness of 64-slice CT angiography compared to conventional coronary angiography based on a coverage with evidence development study in Ontario. Goeree R; Blackhouse G; Bowen JM; O'Reilly D; Sutherland S; Hopkins R; Chow B; Freeman M; Provost Y; Dennie C; Cohen E; Marcuzzi D; Iwanochko R; Moody A; Paul N; Parker JD Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Oct; 13(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 24138652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Leschka S; Scheffel H; Desbiolles L; Plass A; Gaemperli O; Stolzmann P; Genoni M; Luescher T; Marincek B; Kaufmann P; Alkadhi H Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1154-61. PubMed ID: 18032458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. Meijboom WB; van Mieghem CA; Mollet NR; Pugliese F; Weustink AC; van Pelt N; Cademartiri F; Nieman K; Boersma E; de Jaegere P; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Oct; 50(15):1469-75. PubMed ID: 17919567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study. Lorenzoni V; Bellelli S; Caselli C; Knuuti J; Underwood SR; Neglia D; Turchetti G; Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Dec; 20(9):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 31410670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The pre-test risk stratified cost-effectiveness of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in the detection of significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients otherwise referred to invasive coronary angiography. Kreisz FP; Merlin T; Moss J; Atherton J; Hiller JE; Gericke CA Heart Lung Circ; 2009 Jun; 18(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 19250870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of coronary artery disease using coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography versus multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of calcium score. Kakuta K; Dohi K; Yamada T; Yamanaka T; Kawamura M; Nakamori S; Nakajima H; Tanigawa T; Onishi K; Yamada N; Nakamura M; Ito M J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Jul; 27(7):775-85. PubMed ID: 24679739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter? Rademaker AA; Danad I; Groothuis JG; Heymans MW; Marcu CB; Knaapen P; Appelman YE Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 23804558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 64-slice computed tomography vs. cardiac catheterization to rule out coronary artery disease before non-coronary cardiovascular surgery. Catalán P; Callejo D; Blasco JA Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 14(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22761509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. Meijboom WB; Meijs MF; Schuijf JD; Cramer MJ; Mollet NR; van Mieghem CA; Nieman K; van Werkhoven JM; Pundziute G; Weustink AC; de Vos AM; Pugliese F; Rensing B; Jukema JW; Bax JJ; Prokop M; Doevendans PA; Hunink MG; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 52(25):2135-44. PubMed ID: 19095130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography. Herzog BA; Wyss CA; Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Valenta I; Treyer V; Landmesser U; Kaufmann PA Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(20):1656-61. PubMed ID: 19581273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of cardiac fusion images from myocardial perfusion imaging and multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions: an observational study. Kadokami T; Ando S; Momii H; Yoshida M; Narita S; Fukunaga T; Nishi J; Tamura A Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jan; 33(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 22008633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography coronary angiography accuracy in women and men at low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease. Dharampal AS; Papadopoulou SL; Rossi A; Weustink AC; Mollet NR; Meijboom WB; Neefjes LA; Nieman K; Boersma E; de Feijter PJ; Krestin GP Eur Radiol; 2012 Nov; 22(11):2415-23. PubMed ID: 22669338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary artery disease in patients with cardiac tumors: preoperative assessment by computed tomography coronary angiography. Scheffel H; Stolzmann P; Plass A; Leschka S; Grünenfelder J; Falk V; Marincek B; Alkadhi H Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 10(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 20118120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of 320-detector CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: preliminary results. Xu L; Yang L; Fan Z; Yu W; Lv B; Zhang Z Eur Radiol; 2011 May; 21(5):936-43. PubMed ID: 21153826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of a novel indication of computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Powell ES; Patterson BW; Venkatesh AK; Khare RK Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22337217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (from the Prospective National Multicenter Multivendor EVASCAN Study). Gueret P; Deux JF; Bonello L; Sarran A; Tron C; Christiaens L; Dacher JN; Bertrand D; Leborgne L; Renard C; Caussin C; Cluzel P; Helft G; Crochet D; Vernhet-Kovacsik H; Chabbert V; Ferrari E; Gilard M; Willoteaux S; Furber A; Barone-Rochette G; Jankowski A; Douek P; Mousseaux E; Sirol M; Niarra R; Chatellier G; Laissy JP Am J Cardiol; 2013 Feb; 111(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 23261002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid imaging using quantitative H215O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. Danad I; Raijmakers PG; Appelman YE; Harms HJ; de Haan S; van den Oever ML; Heymans MW; Tulevski II; van Kuijk C; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Lubberink M; van Rossum AC; Knaapen P J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 54(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23232274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct costs and cost-effectiveness of dual-source computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Dorenkamp M; Bonaventura K; Sohns C; Becker CR; Leber AW Heart; 2012 Mar; 98(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 21846767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice. Groothuis JG; Beek AM; Meijerink MR; Brinckman SL; Heymans MW; van Kuijk C; van Rossum AC Int J Cardiol; 2012 May; 156(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 21195491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of high-pitch prospectively ECG-triggering CT coronary angiography for assessment of stenosis in 103 patients: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Hu XH; Zheng WL; Wang D; Xie SS; Wu R; Zhang SZ Clin Radiol; 2012 Nov; 67(11):1083-8. PubMed ID: 22613169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]