352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140116)
21. Glaucoma electronic patient record--design, experience and study of high-risk patients.
Imrie F; Blaikie A; Cobb C; Sinclair A; Wilson D; Dobson S; Sanders R
Eye (Lond); 2005 Sep; 19(9):956-62. PubMed ID: 16052257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.
Henson DB; Spencer AF; Harper R; Cadman EJ
Eye (Lond); 2003 Jan; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12579165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of changes in referral behaviour following NICE guideline publication on agreement of examination findings between professionals in an established glaucoma referral refinement pathway: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 97(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 23111242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality of general practitioner referrals to outpatient departments: assessment by specialists and a general practitioner.
Jenkins RM
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Mar; 43(368):111-3. PubMed ID: 8323788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Positive predictive value of optometrist-initiated referrals for glaucoma.
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jan; 19(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 10615440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Standardising the cataract referral process for public hospitals: perspectives of optometrists in New South Wales, Australia.
Ho KC; Tran J; Hoang D; Kaushik S; Ford B; Palagyi A; Do VQ; Stapleton F; White A; Keay L
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Mar; 103(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 31218754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the effectiveness of two enhanced glaucoma referral schemes.
Parkins DJ; Edgar DF
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jul; 31(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 21615447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic.
Bell RW; O'Brien C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 9135806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland.
Sii S; Nasser A; Loo CY; Croghan C; Rotchford A; Agarwal PK
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 103(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 29777044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial.
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I; Cousens S
Eye (Lond); 2004 May; 18(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 15131679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.
Huang J; Yapp M; Hennessy MP; Ly A; Masselos K; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):675-683. PubMed ID: 31852027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality of referrals to a pediatric ophthalmology practice in South Western Ontario.
Makar I; Kerrin M; Smith K
Strabismus; 2013 Jun; 21(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 23713928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of optic disc photographs for glaucoma by UK optometrists: the Moorfields Optic Disc Assessment Study (MODAS).
Hadwin SE; Redmond T; Garway-Heath DF; Lemij HG; Reus NJ; Ward G; Anderson RS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 23634792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study to assess the quality of information in referral letters to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey.
Izadi M; Gill DS; Naini FB
Prim Dent Care; 2010 Apr; 17(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 20353655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Systematic Evaluation of State Laws Governing Optometric Glaucoma Management in the United States Upto 2015.
Chodnicki K; Kalarn S; Quinn L; Jampel H; Saeedi O
J Glaucoma; 2018 Mar; 27(3):233-238. PubMed ID: 29303871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of referrals to the hospital eye service by optometrists and GPs in Bradford and Airedale.
Davey CJ; Green C; Elliott DB
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 21070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patterns of adherence to NICE glaucoma guidance in two different service delivery models.
Chawla A; Patel I; Yuen C; Fenerty C
Eye (Lond); 2012 Nov; 26(11):1412-7. PubMed ID: 22935671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.
Bowling B; Chen SD; Salmon JF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 89(9):1102-4. PubMed ID: 16113358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.
Barrett C; O'Brien C; Loughman J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):400-410. PubMed ID: 29492992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
