286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140461)
1. Does mating prevent monogamous males from seeking other females? A study in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
Rodriguez NA; Legzim KM; Aliou F; Al-Naimi OA; Bamshad M
Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():185-91. PubMed ID: 24140461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mating increases male's interest in other females: a cognitive study in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
Parker JT; Rodriguez N; Lawal B; Delevan CJ; Bamshad M
Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 21888956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mating and social exposure induces an opioid-dependent conditioned place preference in male but not in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
Ulloa M; Portillo W; Díaz NF; Young LJ; Camacho FJ; Rodríguez VM; Paredes RG
Horm Behav; 2018 Jan; 97():47-55. PubMed ID: 29111331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preference to bond? Male prairie voles form pair bonds even in the presence of multiple receptive females.
Blocker TD; Ophir AG
Anim Behav; 2016 Dec; 122():89-97. PubMed ID: 28579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical separation from the mate diminishes male's attentiveness towards other females: a study in monogamous prairie voles
Delevan CJ; Rodriguez NA; Legzim KM; Aliou F; Parker JT; Bamshad M
Curr Zool; 2017 Oct; 63(5):537-544. PubMed ID: 29492013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in affiliative behavior, pair bonding, and vaginal cytology in two species of vole (Microtus ochrogaster and M. montanus).
Shapiro LE; Dewsbury DA
J Comp Psychol; 1990 Sep; 104(3):268-274. PubMed ID: 2225765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three experiments on mate choice in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).
Salo AL; Dewsbury DA
J Comp Psychol; 1995 Mar; 109(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7705059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How prior pair-bonding experience affects future bonding behavior in monogamous prairie voles.
Harbert KJ; Pellegrini M; Gordon KM; Donaldson ZR
Horm Behav; 2020 Nov; 126():104847. PubMed ID: 32910950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of experience and available cues on estrous versus diestrous preferences in male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster.
Taylor SA; Dewsbury DA
Physiol Behav; 1988; 42(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 3290915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): the role of social and sexual experience.
Williams JR; Catania KC; Carter CS
Horm Behav; 1992 Sep; 26(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 1398553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual incentive motivation, olfactory preference, and activation of the vomeronasal projection pathway by sexually relevant cues in non-copulating and naive male rats.
Portillo W; Paredes RG
Horm Behav; 2004 Sep; 46(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 15325233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonding against the odds: Male prairie vole response to the "widow effect" among females.
Forero SA; Ophir AG
Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104968. PubMed ID: 37984679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neurochemical regulation of pair bonding in male prairie voles.
Wang Z; Aragona BJ
Physiol Behav; 2004 Nov; 83(2):319-28. PubMed ID: 15488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Raised without a father: monoparental care effects over development, sexual behavior, sexual reward, and pair bonding in prairie voles.
Valera-Marín G; Young LJ; Camacho F; Paredes RG; Rodríguez VM; Díaz NF; Portillo W
Behav Brain Res; 2021 Jun; 408():113264. PubMed ID: 33775781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a D2 receptor antagonist on repeated pair bond formation in the male prairie vole.
Herschberger MR; Perkeybile AM
Horm Behav; 2022 May; 141():105149. PubMed ID: 35248868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Female-directed aggression predicts paternal behavior, but female prairie voles prefer affiliative males to paternal males.
Ophir AG; Crino OL; Wilkerson QC; Wolff JO; Phelps SM
Brain Behav Evol; 2008; 71(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 17878716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Male prairie voles with different avpr1a microsatellite lengths do not differ in courtship behaviour.
Graham BM; Solomon NG; Noe DA; Keane B
Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():53-7. PubMed ID: 27083501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lesions of the vomeronasal organ disrupt mating-induced pair bonding in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
Curtis JT; Liu Y; Wang Z
Brain Res; 2001 May; 901(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 11368964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do olfactory cues from males with different avpr1a genotypes affect female mate choice in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster?
Hayes-Puttfarcken AL; Kemmerly C; Keane B; Solomon NG
Behav Processes; 2020 Nov; 180():104228. PubMed ID: 32882344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When to Cheat: Modeling Dynamics of Paternity and Promiscuity in Socially Monogamous Prairie Voles (
Rice MA; Restrepo LF; Ophir AG
Front Ecol Evol; 2018; 6():. PubMed ID: 34222266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
