These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140461)

  • 1. Does mating prevent monogamous males from seeking other females? A study in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
    Rodriguez NA; Legzim KM; Aliou F; Al-Naimi OA; Bamshad M
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():185-91. PubMed ID: 24140461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mating increases male's interest in other females: a cognitive study in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
    Parker JT; Rodriguez N; Lawal B; Delevan CJ; Bamshad M
    Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 21888956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mating and social exposure induces an opioid-dependent conditioned place preference in male but not in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
    Ulloa M; Portillo W; Díaz NF; Young LJ; Camacho FJ; Rodríguez VM; Paredes RG
    Horm Behav; 2018 Jan; 97():47-55. PubMed ID: 29111331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preference to bond? Male prairie voles form pair bonds even in the presence of multiple receptive females.
    Blocker TD; Ophir AG
    Anim Behav; 2016 Dec; 122():89-97. PubMed ID: 28579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical separation from the mate diminishes male's attentiveness towards other females: a study in monogamous prairie voles
    Delevan CJ; Rodriguez NA; Legzim KM; Aliou F; Parker JT; Bamshad M
    Curr Zool; 2017 Oct; 63(5):537-544. PubMed ID: 29492013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in affiliative behavior, pair bonding, and vaginal cytology in two species of vole (Microtus ochrogaster and M. montanus).
    Shapiro LE; Dewsbury DA
    J Comp Psychol; 1990 Sep; 104(3):268-274. PubMed ID: 2225765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three experiments on mate choice in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus).
    Salo AL; Dewsbury DA
    J Comp Psychol; 1995 Mar; 109(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7705059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How prior pair-bonding experience affects future bonding behavior in monogamous prairie voles.
    Harbert KJ; Pellegrini M; Gordon KM; Donaldson ZR
    Horm Behav; 2020 Nov; 126():104847. PubMed ID: 32910950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of experience and available cues on estrous versus diestrous preferences in male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster.
    Taylor SA; Dewsbury DA
    Physiol Behav; 1988; 42(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 3290915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): the role of social and sexual experience.
    Williams JR; Catania KC; Carter CS
    Horm Behav; 1992 Sep; 26(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 1398553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual incentive motivation, olfactory preference, and activation of the vomeronasal projection pathway by sexually relevant cues in non-copulating and naive male rats.
    Portillo W; Paredes RG
    Horm Behav; 2004 Sep; 46(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 15325233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding against the odds: Male prairie vole response to the "widow effect" among females.
    Forero SA; Ophir AG
    Behav Processes; 2023 Nov; 213():104968. PubMed ID: 37984679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurochemical regulation of pair bonding in male prairie voles.
    Wang Z; Aragona BJ
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Nov; 83(2):319-28. PubMed ID: 15488548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Raised without a father: monoparental care effects over development, sexual behavior, sexual reward, and pair bonding in prairie voles.
    Valera-Marín G; Young LJ; Camacho F; Paredes RG; Rodríguez VM; Díaz NF; Portillo W
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Jun; 408():113264. PubMed ID: 33775781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a D2 receptor antagonist on repeated pair bond formation in the male prairie vole.
    Herschberger MR; Perkeybile AM
    Horm Behav; 2022 May; 141():105149. PubMed ID: 35248868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female-directed aggression predicts paternal behavior, but female prairie voles prefer affiliative males to paternal males.
    Ophir AG; Crino OL; Wilkerson QC; Wolff JO; Phelps SM
    Brain Behav Evol; 2008; 71(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 17878716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male prairie voles with different avpr1a microsatellite lengths do not differ in courtship behaviour.
    Graham BM; Solomon NG; Noe DA; Keane B
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():53-7. PubMed ID: 27083501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lesions of the vomeronasal organ disrupt mating-induced pair bonding in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).
    Curtis JT; Liu Y; Wang Z
    Brain Res; 2001 May; 901(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 11368964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do olfactory cues from males with different avpr1a genotypes affect female mate choice in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster?
    Hayes-Puttfarcken AL; Kemmerly C; Keane B; Solomon NG
    Behav Processes; 2020 Nov; 180():104228. PubMed ID: 32882344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When to Cheat: Modeling Dynamics of Paternity and Promiscuity in Socially Monogamous Prairie Voles (
    Rice MA; Restrepo LF; Ophir AG
    Front Ecol Evol; 2018; 6():. PubMed ID: 34222266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.