These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140681)
1. Hygienic aspects of livestock manure management and biogas systems operated by small-scale pig farmers in Vietnam. Huong LQ; Madsen H; Anh le X; Ngoc PT; Dalsgaard A Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():53-7. PubMed ID: 24140681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival of Salmonella spp. and fecal indicator bacteria in Vietnamese biogas digesters receiving pig slurry. Huong LQ; Forslund A; Madsen H; Dalsgaard A Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2014 Sep; 217(7):785-95. PubMed ID: 24933419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of temperature on survival of pathogenic bacteria in biogas plants. Iwasaki M; Yamashiro T; Beneragama N; Nishida T; Kida K; Ihara I; Takahashi J; Umetsu K Anim Sci J; 2011 Oct; 82(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 21951908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrogen sulfide removal from livestock biogas by a farm-scale bio-filter desulfurization system. Su JJ; Chang YC; Chen YJ; Chang KC; Lee SY Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1288-93. PubMed ID: 23508153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Triple-hurdle model analysis of the factors influencing biogas digester building, use and processing by Chinese pig farmers. Chen Y; Wang F; Li H; Aftab S; Liu Y Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 761():143259. PubMed ID: 33234273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure. Costa A; Gusmara C; Gardoni D; Zaninelli M; Tambone F; Sala V; Guarino M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(31):24135-24146. PubMed ID: 28884271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Continuous dry fermentation of pig manure using up plug-flow type anaerobic reactor]. Chen C; Deng LW; Xin X; Zheng D; Liu Y; Kong CX Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Mar; 33(3):1033-40. PubMed ID: 22624405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mode of mixing. Karim K; Hoffmann R; Thomas Klasson K; Al-Dahhan MH Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3597-606. PubMed ID: 16112708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of different composting techniques in reducing oestrogens content in manure from livestock in a Vietnamese setting. Le TA; Clemens J; Nguyen TH Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Jan; 185(1):415-23. PubMed ID: 22350350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cow, sheep and llama manure at psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion with low cost tubular digesters in cold climate and high altitude. Martí-Herrero J; Alvarez R; Cespedes R; Rojas MR; Conde V; Aliaga L; Balboa M; Danov S Bioresour Technol; 2015 Apr; 181():238-46. PubMed ID: 25656868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Chae KJ; Jang A; Yim SK; Kim IS Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17306978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of biogas production potential by dry anaerobic digestion of switchgrass--animal manure mixtures. Ahn HK; Smith MC; Kondrad SL; White JW Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2010 Feb; 160(4):965-75. PubMed ID: 19462259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thermophilic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol: process performance and digestate stability. Astals S; Nolla-Ardèvol V; Mata-Alvarez J J Biotechnol; 2013 Jul; 166(3):97-104. PubMed ID: 23685137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Escherichia coli contamination of fish raised in integrated pig-fish aquaculture systems in Vietnam. Dang ST; Dalsgaard A J Food Prot; 2012 Jul; 75(7):1317-9. PubMed ID: 22980016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotypic and phenotypic situation of antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli in water and manure between biogas and non-biogas swine farms in central Thailand. Dawangpa A; Lertwatcharasarakul P; Ramasoota P; Boonsoongnern A; Ratanavanichrojn N; Sanguankiat A; Phatthanakunanan S; Tulayakul P J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 279():111659. PubMed ID: 33310234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Simultaneous determination of heavy metals in waste and biogas slurry of scale farm by microwave digestion/inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry]. He Q; Mhamadi AT; Ji FY; Yu DN; Zhou GM; Li S Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2012 Dec; 32(12):3399-401. PubMed ID: 23427576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple biofilter for treatment of pig slurry in Malaysia. Sommer SG; Mathanpaal G; Dass GT Environ Technol; 2005 Mar; 26(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 15881027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field test of methane fermentation system for treating swine wastes. Kataoka N; Suzuki T; Ishida K; Yamada N; Kurata N; Katayose M; Honda K Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):103-12. PubMed ID: 12201090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pilot project of biogas production from pig manure and urine mixture at ambient temperature in Ventanilla (Lima, Peru). Ferrer I; Gamiz M; Almeida M; Ruiz A Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 18417337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dis-adoption of small-scale biogas plants in Vietnam: what is their fate? Paramonova K; Mazancová J; Roubík H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(1):2329-2339. PubMed ID: 36369438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]