These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140758)

  • 1. Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    Acupunct Med; 2014 Feb; 32(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24140758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture for stroke.
    Zhang JH; Wang D; Liu M
    Neuroepidemiology; 2014; 42(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 24356063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical research on acupuncture. Part 2. Controlled clinical trials, an overview of their methods.
    Birch S
    J Altern Complement Med; 2004 Jun; 10(3):481-98. PubMed ID: 15253852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of acupuncture for migraine: critical literature review.
    Griggs C; Jensen J
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 May; 54(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 16671978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statins and cancer risk: a literature-based meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of 35 randomized controlled trials.
    Bonovas S; Filioussi K; Tsavaris N; Sitaras NM
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Oct; 24(30):4808-17. PubMed ID: 17001070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of problems in clinical acupuncture research.
    Ernst E; White AR
    Am J Chin Med; 1997; 25(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 9166992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study.
    Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA
    BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of clinical trials with early stopping: an investigation of potential bias.
    Schou IM; Marschner IC
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4859-74. PubMed ID: 23824994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):820-6. PubMed ID: 9382404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9096):123-7. PubMed ID: 9439507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.