192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140826)
41. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Vocal Performance of Group Fitness Instructors Before and After Instruction: Changes in Acoustic Measures and Self-Ratings.
Dallaston K; Rumbach AF
J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25795364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Exploring the anatomical encoding of voice with a mathematical model of the vocal system.
Assaneo MF; Sitt J; Varoquaux G; Sigman M; Cohen L; Trevisan MA
Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():31-39. PubMed ID: 27436593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Male and female voices activate distinct regions in the male brain.
Sokhi DS; Hunter MD; Wilkinson ID; Woodruff PW
Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):572-8. PubMed ID: 15978839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Auditory feedback control of voice fundamental frequency in school children.
Liu P; Chen Z; Larson CR; Huang D; Liu H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1306-12. PubMed ID: 20815465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Multidimensional Voice Data on Participants With Perceptually Normal Voices From Ages 60 to 80: A Preliminary Acoustic Reference for the Elderly Population.
Schaeffer N; Knudsen M; Small A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 25683920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influences of fundamental frequency, formant frequencies, aperiodicity, and spectrum level on the perception of voice gender.
Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):285-96. PubMed ID: 23882002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The timecourse of expression aftereffects.
Burton N; Jeffery L; Bonner J; Rhodes G
J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):1. PubMed ID: 27918785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
Kopf LM; Jackson-Menaldi C; Rubin AD; Skeffington J; Hunter EJ; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Gaze direction affects the magnitude of face identity aftereffects.
Kloth N; Jeffery L; Rhodes G
J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intelligibility benefit for familiar voices is not accompanied by better discrimination of fundamental frequency or vocal tract length.
Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108704. PubMed ID: 36701896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Individual differences in voice adaptability are specifically linked to voice perception skill.
Bestelmeyer PEG; Mühl C
Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104582. PubMed ID: 33450447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Associations between the Transsexual Voice Questionnaire (TVQ
Dacakis G; Oates J; Douglas J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Nov; 52(6):831-838. PubMed ID: 28425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.
Re DE; O'Connor JJ; Bennett PJ; Feinberg DR
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32719. PubMed ID: 22403701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Perceptual analysis of the male-to-female transgender voice after glottoplasty-the telephone test.
Meister J; Kühn H; Shehata-Dieler W; Hagen R; Kleinsasser N
Laryngoscope; 2017 Apr; 127(4):875-881. PubMed ID: 27334765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are sensitive to the correlation between pitch and timbre in human speech.
Sturdy SK; Smith DRR; George DN
Anim Cogn; 2022 Jun; 25(3):545-554. PubMed ID: 34714438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Recalibration of vocal affect by a dynamic face.
Baart M; Vroomen J
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1911-1918. PubMed ID: 29696314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
