109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140912)
1. Joint estimation of shape and deformation for the detection of lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Hong BW
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(21):7757-75. PubMed ID: 24140912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI.
Melbourne A; Hipwell J; Modat M; Mertzanidou T; Huisman H; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(24):7693-708. PubMed ID: 22086390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spectral embedding based active contour (SEAC) for lesion segmentation on breast dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Agner SC; Xu J; Madabhushi A
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):032305. PubMed ID: 23464337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust segmentation of mass-lesions in contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MR images.
Meinel LA; Buelow T; Huo D; Shimauchi A; Kose U; Buurman J; Newstead G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 20578017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated localization of breast cancer in DCE-MRI.
Gubern-Mérida A; Martí R; Melendez J; Hauth JL; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N; Platel B
Med Image Anal; 2015 Feb; 20(1):265-74. PubMed ID: 25532510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint.
Rohlfing T; Maurer CR; Bluemke DA; Jacobs MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):730-41. PubMed ID: 12872948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of 3D DCE-MRI of the kidneys using non-rigid image registration and segmentation of voxel time courses.
Zöllner FG; Sance R; Rogelj P; Ledesma-Carbayo MJ; Rørvik J; Santos A; Lundervold A
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 19135861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of a fully automatic lesion detection system for breast DCE-MRI.
Vignati A; Giannini V; De Luca M; Morra L; Persano D; Carbonaro LA; Bertotto I; Martincich L; Regge D; Bert A; Sardanelli F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1341-51. PubMed ID: 21965159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A fully automatic multiscale 3-dimensional Hessian-based algorithm for vessel detection in breast DCE-MRI.
Vignati A; Giannini V; Bert A; Borrelli P; De Luca M; Martincich L; Sardanelli F; Regge D
Invest Radiol; 2012 Dec; 47(12):705-10. PubMed ID: 23070098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unsupervised tissue segmentation from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Chiusano G; Staglianò A; Basso C; Verri A
Artif Intell Med; 2014 May; 61(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24661609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering.
Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing early contrast uptake of ductal carcinoma in situ with high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: a pilot study.
Jansen SA; Fan X; Medved M; Abe H; Shimauchi A; Yang C; Zamora M; Foxley S; Olopade OI; Karczmar GS; Newstead GM
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(19):N473-85. PubMed ID: 20858914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GPU-accelerated nonparametric kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.
Hsu YH; Ferl GZ; Ng CM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 31(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 23200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using nonlocal means.
Adluru G; Tasdizen T; Schabel MC; DiBella EV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Nov; 32(5):1217-27. PubMed ID: 21031528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
