BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140939)

  • 1. Bayesian networks for fMRI: a primer.
    Mumford JA; Ramsey JD
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():573-82. PubMed ID: 24140939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structurally-informed Bayesian functional connectivity analysis.
    Hinne M; Ambrogioni L; Janssen RJ; Heskes T; van Gerven MA
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():294-305. PubMed ID: 24121202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and calibration of functional network modeling methods based on known anatomical connections.
    Dawson DA; Cha K; Lewis LB; Mendola JD; Shmuel A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():331-43. PubMed ID: 23153969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probabilistic framework for brain connectivity from functional MR images.
    Rajapakse JC; Wang Y; Zheng X; Zhou J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 18541489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples.
    Gates KM; Molenaar PC
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):310-9. PubMed ID: 22732562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probabilistic graphical models for effective connectivity extraction in the brain using FMRI data.
    Ali Safari M; Mohammadbeigi M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 22874167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning effective brain connectivity with dynamic Bayesian networks.
    Rajapakse JC; Zhou J
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 17644415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI.
    Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pattern classification of fMRI data: applications for analysis of spatially distributed cortical networks.
    Yourganov G; Schmah T; Churchill NW; Berman MG; Grady CL; Strother SC
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():117-32. PubMed ID: 24705202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SPARK: Sparsity-based analysis of reliable k-hubness and overlapping network structure in brain functional connectivity.
    Lee K; Lina JM; Gotman J; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():434-449. PubMed ID: 27046111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SACICA: a sparse approximation coefficient-based ICA model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis.
    Wang N; Zeng W; Chen L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 23563324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of resting-state FMRI and diffusion-weighted MRI connectivity analyses of the human brain: limitations and improvement.
    Zhu DC; Majumdar S
    J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 23279672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest reliability of resting-state connectivity network characteristics using fMRI and graph theoretical measures.
    Braun U; Plichta MM; Esslinger C; Sauer C; Haddad L; Grimm O; Mier D; Mohnke S; Heinz A; Erk S; Walter H; Seiferth N; Kirsch P; Meyer-Lindenberg A
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1404-12. PubMed ID: 21888983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clustering-led complex brain networks approach.
    Liu D; Zhong N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2955-62. PubMed ID: 25227002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatially adaptive mixture modeling for analysis of FMRI time series.
    Vincent T; Risser L; Ciuciu P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Apr; 29(4):1059-74. PubMed ID: 20350840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine-grained mapping of mouse brain functional connectivity with resting-state fMRI.
    Mechling AE; Hübner NS; Lee HL; Hennig J; von Elverfeldt D; Harsan LA
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():203-15. PubMed ID: 24718287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating spatial dependence into Bayesian multiple testing of statistical parametric maps in functional neuroimaging.
    Brown DA; Lazar NA; Datta GS; Jang W; McDowell JE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():97-112. PubMed ID: 23981437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome.
    Gilson M; Moreno-Bote R; Ponce-Alvarez A; Ritter P; Deco G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004762. PubMed ID: 26982185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.