These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24140995)

  • 1. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour.
    Gómez-Polo C; Gómez-Polo M; Celemin-Viñuela A; Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 24140995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical study relating CIELCH coordinates to the color dimensions of the 3D-Master System in a Spanish population.
    Gómez-Polo C; Gómez-Polo M; Celemín Viñuela A; Martínez Vázquez de Parga JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 25453564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods.
    Bahannan SA
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24252802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shade determination using camouflaged visual shade guides and an electronic spectrophotometer.
    Kvalheim SF; Øilo M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 24922992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional representation of the Vita Toothguide 3D-Master: An in vivo clinical study.
    Gómez-Polo C; Fraile JF; López NQ; Muñoz MP; Lobato M; Montero J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Mar; 36(3):421-428. PubMed ID: 38053482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods.
    Lasserre JF; Pop-Ciutrila IS; Colosi HA
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e29-36. PubMed ID: 22101123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of shade-matching performance using intraoral scanner, spectrophotometer, and visual assessment.
    Lee JH; Kim HK
    Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):23640. PubMed ID: 39384854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Shade Matching in Natural Dentitions Using Intraoral Digital Spectrophotometer in LED and Filtered LED Light Sources.
    Chitrarsu VK; Chidambaranathan AS; Balasubramaniam M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e68-e73. PubMed ID: 29086458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience.
    Yılmaz B; Irmak Ö; Yaman BC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Sep; 31(5):500-507. PubMed ID: 31228358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two optical devices used for artificial tooth color selection.
    Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Dent Med Probl; 2022; 59(2):249-253. PubMed ID: 35584297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer.
    Browning WD; Chan DC; Blalock JS; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 19544824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.