122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24141063)
21. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Flow immunocytochemistry of marker expression in cells from body cavity fluids.
Krishan A; Ganjei-Azar P; Hamelik R; Sharma D; Reis I; Nadji M
Cytometry A; 2010 Feb; 77(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 19899128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements.
Pektas ZO; Keskin A; Günhan O; Karslioğlu Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):628-35. PubMed ID: 16546642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. DNA Ploidy Analysis and Cell Block Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Malignant Effusions.
Puri M; Sen R; Gupta M; Kalra R; Bhargava S; Puri K
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 31466063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Roles of DNA cytometry and detection of EBERs in predicting a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Maohuai C; Chang AR; Shikyuen L
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 11444190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. DNA aneuploidy with image cytometry for detecting dysplasia and carcinoma in oral potentially malignant disorders: A prospective diagnostic study.
Li C; Wu L; Deng Y; Shen X; Liu W; Shi L
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6411-6420. PubMed ID: 32638539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Thyroid transcription factor-1 is highly sensitive and specific in differentiating metastatic pulmonary from extrapulmonary adenocarcinoma in effusion fluid cytology specimens.
Ng WK; Chow JC; Ng PK
Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11836702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Value of the EZH2 Immunomarker in Malignant Effusion Cytology.
Ang PP; Tan GC; Karim N; Wong YP
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(3):248-255. PubMed ID: 31352449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective, blinded comparison of cytology and DNA-image cytometry of brush biopsies for early detection of oral malignancy.
Kämmerer PW; Koch FP; Santoro M; Babaryka G; Biesterfeld S; Brieger J; Kunkel M
Oral Oncol; 2013 May; 49(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 23318121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic DNA-flow- vs. -image-cytometry in effusion cytology.
Motherby H; Pomjanski N; Kube M; Boros A; Heiden T; Tribukait B; Böcking A
Anal Cell Pathol; 2002; 24(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 12122279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cytologic grading and DNA image cytometry of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspiration cytology smears.
Dey P; Luthra UK; Prasad A; Sheikh ZA; George SS
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Feb; 21(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10068770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The clinical value of image cytometry DNA analysis in distinguishing branchial cleft cysts from cystic metastases of head and neck cancer.
Nordemar S; Högmo A; Lindholm J; Tani E; Sjöström B; Auer G; Munck-Wikland E
Laryngoscope; 2002 Nov; 112(11):1983-7. PubMed ID: 12439167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of cytologic and acridine-orange flow-cytometric detection of malignant cells in human body cavity fluids.
Katz RL; Johnson TS; Williamson KD
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1985 Sep; 7(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 4052224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of histologic and cytologic specimens of urothelial carcinoma with image analysis. Implications for grading.
Forte JD; Croker BP; Hendricks JB
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Apr; 19(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 9113309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Evaluation of immunohistochemistry staining and cytologic diagnosis by using cell block sections prepared with effusion fluid cytology specimens].
Mao YY; Yang M; Liu DG; Lin MH; Zhang LQ; Chen ZQ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 38(8):547-50. PubMed ID: 20021967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Significance of FCM-DNA ploidy pattern, AgNOR counting, hTERT and PCNA expression in differentiating malignant from benign serous effusion].
Wu LY; Liu BR; Lu J; Ling MD; Chen J; Li P; Jiang Y
Ai Zheng; 2007 Feb; 26(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 17298749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of DNA ploidy in archival tissue from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using flow and image cytometry.
Zbieranowski I; Le Riche JC; Palcic B; Gascoyne R; Connors J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Jul; 4(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 1390299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Complementary value of DNA flow cytometry and image morphometry in detection of malignant cells in effusion fluids.
Bisht B; Handa U; Mohan H; Lehl SS
Malays J Pathol; 2014 Aug; 36(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 25194530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cytologic and DNA cytometric diagnosis and therapy monitoring of squamous cell carcinoma in situ and malignant melanoma of the cornea and conjunctiva.
Nadjari B; Kersten A; Ross B; Motherby H; Krallmann R; Sundmacher R; Böcking A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Oct; 21(5):387-96. PubMed ID: 10560521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation of DNA ploidy and histologic diagnosis from prostate core-needle biopsies: is DNA ploidy more sensitive than histology for the diagnosis of carcinoma in small specimens?
Lo J; Kerns BJ; Amling CL; Robertson CN; Layfield LJ
J Surg Oncol; 1996 Sep; 63(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 8841465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
