These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24141594)

  • 1. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
    Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bimodal hearing and speech perception with a competing talker.
    Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Hahn M; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1400-15. PubMed ID: 21498577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance?
    Mulhern L; Cullington H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Test Condition on Speech Perception With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 26650652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of a contralateral hearing aid to perception of consonant voicing, intonation, and emotional state in adult cochlear implantees.
    Most T; Gaon-Sivan G; Shpak T; Luntz M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):244-58. PubMed ID: 22057984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
    Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.
    Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.