These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24141634)

  • 1. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses.
    Papas EB; Tilia D; Tomlinson D; Williams J; Chan E; Chan J; Golebiowski B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 91(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 24141634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule.
    Brennan NA; Coles ML; Comstock TL; Levy B
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 12045062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Short Recovery Periods on Ocular Comfort During Daily Lens Wear.
    Stahl U; Keir NJ; Landers A; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 27362613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comfort response of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
    Varikooty J; Keir N; Richter D; Jones LW; Woods C; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 90(9):945-53. PubMed ID: 23892493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
    Dumbleton KA; Woods CA; Jones LW; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demographic Factors Affect Ocular Comfort Ratings During Contact Lens Wear.
    Naduvilath T; Papas EB; Lazon de la Jara P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 27254808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses.
    Varikooty J; Schulze MM; Dumbleton K; Keir N; Woods CA; Fonn D; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 25628269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors in contact lens symptoms: evidence from a multistudy database.
    Truong TN; Graham AD; Lin MC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 91(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 24317134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
    Cheung SW; Cho P; Chan B; Choy C; Ng V
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of replacement schedule and care regimen on patient comfort and satisfaction with daily wear frequent-replacement contact lenses.
    Malet F; Schnider CM
    CLAO J; 2002 Jul; 28(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 12144230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal changes in contact lens comfort over a day of wear.
    Woods CA; Bentley SA; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Nov; 36(6):643-648. PubMed ID: 27790772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of tear osmolarity and ocular comfort between daily disposable contact lenses: hilafilcon B hydrogel versus narafilcon A silicone hydrogel.
    Sarac O; Gurdal C; Bostancı-Ceran B; Can I
    Int Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 32(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 22484700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Daily disposed hydrogel lenses--a comparison with biweekly replacement.
    Snyder C; Hammack GG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Mar; 65(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 8201166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ocular discomfort responses after short periods of contact lens wear.
    Papas E; Tilia D; McNally J; de la Jara PL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 92(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 26001894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
    Riley C; Young G; Chalmers R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective Ratings and Satisfaction in Contact Lens Wear.
    Diec J; Naduvilath T; Tilia D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 29424828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers.
    Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacterial populations on silicone hydrogel and hydrogel contact lenses after swimming in a chlorinated pool.
    Choo J; Vuu K; Bergenske P; Burnham K; Smythe J; Caroline P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 15711460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.