126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24141681)
1. Influence of signal processing strategy in auditory abilities.
Melo TM; Bevilacqua MC; Costa OA; Moret AL
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2013; 79(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 24141681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Han D; Liu B; Zhou N; Chen X; Kong Y; Liu H; Zheng Y; Xu L
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 19194297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception in cochlear implant users with the HiRes 120 strategy: a systematic review.
Melo TM; Bevilacqua MC; Costa OA
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 78(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 22714858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audio-visual speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.
Yamamoto R; Naito Y; Tona R; Moroto S; Tamaya R; Fujiwara K; Shinohara S; Takebayashi S; Kikuchi M; Michida T
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():160-168. PubMed ID: 29106867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of age on auditory speech perception development in cochlear-implanted prelingually deaf children.
Hassanzadeh S; Farhadi M; Daneshi A; Emamdjomeh H
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 May; 126(5):524-7. PubMed ID: 12075227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term study of the effect of speech coding strategy on the auditory performance of pre- and post-lingually deafened adults implanted with the Clarion CII.
Filipo R; Mancini P; Ballantyne D; Bosco E; D'Elia C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 15224855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.
Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Skinner MW
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 19106769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5.
Fang HY; Ko HC; Wang NM; Fang TJ; Chao WC; Tsou YT; Wu CM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):799-803. PubMed ID: 24630030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.
Oh SH; Kim CS; Kang EJ; Lee DS; Lee HJ; Chang SO; Ahn SH; Hwang CH; Park HJ; Koo JW
Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 12701730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory training improves auditory performance in cochlear implanted children.
Roman S; Rochette F; Triglia JM; Schön D; Bigand E
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():89-95. PubMed ID: 27240480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential bilateral cochlear implant: results in children and adolescents.
Almeida GFL; Martins MF; Costa LBAD; Costa OAD; Martinho de Carvalho AC
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 30166120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of auditory and language skills in children using cochlear implants with two signal processing strategies.
Melo TM; Yamaguti EH; Moret ALM; Costa OA; Lopes NBF
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 86(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 31324459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear implants with fine structure processing improve speech and tone perception in Mandarin-speaking adults.
Chen X; Liu B; Liu S; Mo L; Li Y; Kong Y; Zheng J; Li Y; Gong S; Han D
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 133(7):733-8. PubMed ID: 23768059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
