These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24141681)
21. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children. Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Everyday listening questionnaire: correlation between subjective hearing and objective performance. Brendel M; Frohne-Buechner C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Buechner A Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 23998527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementation of perceptual channels in children implanted with a HiRes 90K device. Mancini P; Bosco E; D'agosta L; Traisci G; Nicastri M; Capelli G; Ballantyne D; Filipo R Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 129(12):1442-50. PubMed ID: 19922095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High. Holden LK; Brenner C; Reeder RM; Firszt JB Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14(5):276-86. PubMed ID: 23683298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children. Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing the effect of auditory-only and auditory-visual modes in two groups of Persian children using cochlear implants: a randomized clinical trial. Oryadi Zanjani MM; Hasanzadeh S; Rahgozar M; Shemshadi H; Purdy SC; Mahmudi Bakhtiari B; Vahab M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 23896386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults. van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants. Wong AO; Wong LL Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jun; 130(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 15195063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Tyler RS; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Kelsay DM; Gantz BJ; Woodworth GP; Parkinson A Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):180-7. PubMed ID: 9334763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing. Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life. Straatman LV; Huinck WJ; Langereis MC; Snik AF; Mulder JJ Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels. Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA; Gantz BJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Jun; 115(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 16805373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improvement in speech perception and production abilities in children using a multichannel cochlear implant. Waltzman S; Cohen NL; Spivak L; Ying E; Brackett D; Shapiro W; Hoffman R Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 2308447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Speech-perception performance in prelingually deafened French children using the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Uziel AS; Reuillard-Artieres F; Sillon M; Vieu A; Mondain M; Piron JP; Tobey EA Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 8841701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Benefits of simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation on verbal reasoning skills in prelingually deaf children. Jacobs E; Langereis MC; Frijns JH; Free RH; Goedegebure A; Smits C; Stokroos RJ; Ariens-Meijer SA; Mylanus EA; Vermeulen AM Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Nov; 58():104-13. PubMed ID: 27608372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]