These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24142836)
21. Replication of small effect quantitative trait loci for behavioral traits facilitated by estimation of effect size from independent cohorts. Bennett B; Carosone-Link P Genes Brain Behav; 2006 Jul; 5(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 16879634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiple comparisons distortions of parameter estimates. Jeffries NO Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):500-4. PubMed ID: 16971376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study. Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of instrumental variable methods in cohort and nested case-control studies: a simulation study. Uddin MJ; Groenwold RH; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Roes KC; Hoes AW; Klungel OH Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Feb; 23(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 24306965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sample size determination for confidence intervals of interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous predictor and moderator variables. Shieh G Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 20805605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determining sample size when assessing mean equivalence. Asberg A; Solem KB; Mikkelsen G Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Nov; 74(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 25228313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative study of lognormal, gamma and beta modelling in radon mapping with recommendations regarding bias, sample sizes and the treatment of outliers. Murphy P; Organo C J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 18714140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of the estimated intraclass correlation for correcting differences in effect size by level. Ahn S; Myers ND; Jin Y Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):490-502. PubMed ID: 21960061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sequential analysis of latent variables using mixed-effect latent variable models: Impact of non-informative and informative missing data. Sébille V; Hardouin JB; Mesbah M Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4889-904. PubMed ID: 17576119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayesian approach to average power calculations for binary regression models with misclassified outcomes. Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):848-63. PubMed ID: 19061210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation. Waksman JA Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving small-sample inference in group randomized trials with binary outcomes. Westgate PM; Braun TM Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 21213338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimating risk from underpowered, but statistically significant, studies: was APPROVe on TARGET? La Caze A; Duffull S J Clin Pharm Ther; 2011 Dec; 36(6):637-41. PubMed ID: 22023341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of sample size on reproducibility of behavioral teratological study results: a computer simulation experiment using data from the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study of the National Center for Toxicological Research. Tachibana T Teratology; 1990 Sep; 42(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 2274886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing. Aguinis H; Culpepper SA; Pierce CA J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jul; 95(4):648-80. PubMed ID: 20604587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The back-step method--method for obtaining unbiased population parameter estimates for ordered categorical data. Kjellsson MC; Jönsson S; Karlsson MO AAPS J; 2004 Aug; 6(3):e19. PubMed ID: 15760104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bias of estimates of the number needed to treat. Duncan BW; Olkin I Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 15806616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]