BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24143191)

  • 1. Genomic instability: a stronger prognostic marker than proliferation for early stage luminal breast carcinomas.
    Vincent-Salomon A; Benhamo V; Gravier E; Rigaill G; Gruel N; Robin S; de Rycke Y; Mariani O; Pierron G; Gentien D; Reyal F; Cottu P; Fourquet A; Rouzier R; Sastre-Garau X; Delattre O
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76496. PubMed ID: 24143191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An array CGH based genomic instability index (G2I) is predictive of clinical outcome in breast cancer and reveals a subset of tumors without lymph node involvement but with poor prognosis.
    Bonnet F; Guedj M; Jones N; Sfar S; Brouste V; Elarouci N; Banneau G; Orsetti B; Primois C; de Lara CT; Debled M; de Mascarel I; Theillet C; Sévenet N; de Reynies A; MacGrogan G; Longy M
    BMC Med Genomics; 2012 Nov; 5():54. PubMed ID: 23186559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the proliferation markers Ki67, TOP2A, and RacGAP1 in molecular subgroups of breast cancer.
    Milde-Langosch K; Karn T; Müller V; Witzel I; Rody A; Schmidt M; Wirtz RM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jan; 137(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23135572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of prognostic and predictive impact of genomic or central grade and immunohistochemical subtypes or IHC4 in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: WSG-AGO EC-Doc Trial.
    Gluz O; Liedtke C; Huober J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Kates RE; Kreipe HH; Hartmann A; Pelz E; Erber R; Mohrmann S; Möbus V; Augustin D; Hoffmann G; Thomssen C; Jänicke F; Kiechle M; Wallwiener D; Kuhn W; Nitz U; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 27022068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inverse relationship between Ki67 and survival in early luminal breast cancer: confirmation in a multivariate analysis.
    Gallardo A; Garcia-Valdecasas B; Murata P; Teran R; Lopez L; Barnadas A; Lerma E
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 28865009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ki-67 is a prognostic marker for hormone receptor positive tumors.
    Pérez-López ME; García-Gómez J; Alves MT; Paradela A; García-Mata J; García-Caballero T
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2016 Oct; 18(10):996-1002. PubMed ID: 26742937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the prognostic value of genomic grade index, Ki67 expression and mitotic activity index in early node-positive breast cancer patients.
    Bertucci F; Finetti P; Roche H; Le Doussal JM; Marisa L; Martin AL; Lacroix-Triki M; Blanc-Fournier C; Jacquemier J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Viens P; Sotiriou C; Birnbaum D; Penault-Llorca F
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 23117074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer.
    Cheang MC; Chia SK; Voduc D; Gao D; Leung S; Snider J; Watson M; Davies S; Bernard PS; Parker JS; Perou CM; Ellis MJ; Nielsen TO
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 May; 101(10):736-50. PubMed ID: 19436038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Luminal subtypes predict improved survival following central nervous system metastasis in patients with surgically managed metastatic breast carcinoma.
    Wiens AL; Martin SE; Bertsch EC; Vance GH; Stohler RA; Cheng L; Badve S; Hattab EM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Feb; 138(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24476516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Ki67/BCL2 index is associated with worse outcome in early stage breast cancer.
    Min KW; Kim DH; Do SI; Pyo JS; Chae SW; Sohn JH; Kim K; Lee HJ; Kim DH; Oh S; Choi SH; Park YL; Park CH; Kwon MJ; Moon KM
    Postgrad Med J; 2016 Dec; 92(1094):707-714. PubMed ID: 27222586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Respective prognostic value of genomic grade and histological proliferation markers in early stage (pN0) breast carcinoma.
    Reyal F; Bollet MA; Caly M; Gentien D; Carpentier S; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Pierga JY; Cottu P; Dieras V; Sigal-Zafrani B; Vincent-Salomon A; Sastre-Garau X
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35184. PubMed ID: 22529987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal Ki67 cut-off for luminal breast cancer prognostic evaluation: a large case series study with a long-term follow-up.
    Bustreo S; Osella-Abate S; Cassoni P; Donadio M; Airoldi M; Pedani F; Papotti M; Sapino A; Castellano I
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 27155668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prognostic value of mitotic activity index (MAI), phosphohistone H3 (PPH3), cyclin B1, cyclin A, and Ki67, alone and in combinations, in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer.
    Klintman M; Strand C; Ahlin C; Beglerbegovic S; Fjällskog ML; Grabau D; Gudlaugsson E; Janssen EA; Lövgren K; Skaland I; Bendahl PO; Malmström P; Baak JP; Fernö M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81902. PubMed ID: 24324728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power of PgR expression as a prognostic factor for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients at intermediate risk classified by the Ki67 labeling index.
    Kurozumi S; Matsumoto H; Hayashi Y; Tozuka K; Inoue K; Horiguchi J; Takeyoshi I; Oyama T; Kurosumi M
    BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):354. PubMed ID: 28532429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Genomic Grade Assay Compared With Ki67 to Determine Risk of Distant Breast Cancer Recurrence.
    Ignatiadis M; Azim HA; Desmedt C; Veys I; Larsimont D; Salgado R; Lyng MB; Viale G; Leyland-Jones B; Giobbie-Hurder A; Kammler R; Dell'Orto P; Rothé F; Laïos I; Ditzel HJ; Regan MM; Piccart M; Michiels S; Sotiriou C
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Feb; 2(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26633571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic Factors for Luminal B-like Breast Cancer.
    Ding NH; Liu CF; Hu C; Yuan JQ; Liao WH; Xiao Z
    Curr Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 39(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 31209809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of Oncotype Dx score with tumor grade, size, nodal status, proliferative marker Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index in early breast cancer tumors in Saudi Population.
    Durrani S; Al-Mushawa F; Heena H; Wani T; Al-Qahtani A
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Apr; 51():151674. PubMed ID: 33360027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between Ki67 and histological grade in breast cancer patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy.
    Petric M; Martinez S; Acevedo F; Oddo D; Artigas R; Camus M; Sanchez C
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(23):10277-80. PubMed ID: 25556461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Luminal A and luminal B (HER2 negative) subtypes of breast cancer consist of a mixture of tumors with different genotype.
    Yanagawa M; Ikemot K; Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Yamamoto S; Oka M; Oga A; Nagashima Y; Sasaki K
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Jul; 5():376. PubMed ID: 22830453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.
    Ehinger A; Malmström P; Bendahl PO; Elston CW; Falck AK; Forsare C; Grabau D; Rydén L; Stål O; Fernö M;
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27762648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.