These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24143935)
1. Attainment vs exposure: ozone metric responses to source-specific NOx controls using adjoint sensitivity analysis. Pappin AJ; Hakami A Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(23):13519-27. PubMed ID: 24143935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States. Hakami A; Seinfeld JH; Chai T; Tang Y; Carmichael GR; Sandu A Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jun; 40(12):3855-64. PubMed ID: 16830553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diminishing Returns or Compounding Benefits of Air Pollution Control? The Case of NOx and Ozone. Pappin AJ; Mesbah SM; Hakami A; Schott S Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(16):9548-56. PubMed ID: 26207850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precursor reductions and ground-level ozone in the Continental United States. Hidy GM; Blanchard CL J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Oct; 65(10):1261-82. PubMed ID: 26252366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Source attribution of health benefits from air pollution abatement in Canada and the United States: an adjoint sensitivity analysis. Pappin AJ; Hakami A Environ Health Perspect; 2013 May; 121(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23434744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Air quality and climate connections. Fiore AM; Naik V; Leibensperger EM J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Jun; 65(6):645-85. PubMed ID: 25976481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Projected ozone trends and changes in the ozone-precursor relationship in the South Coast Air Basin in response to varying reductions of precursor emissions. Fujita EM; Campbell DE; Stockwell WR; Saunders E; Fitzgerald R; Perea R J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 26514212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of multipollutant air quality management strategies: A case study for five cities in the United States. Liao KJ; Hou X J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Jun; 65(6):732-42. PubMed ID: 25976486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling and direct sensitivity analysis of biogenic emissions impacts on regional ozone formation in the Mexico-U.S. border area. Mendoza-Dominguez A; Wilkinson JG; Yang YJ; Russell AG J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Jan; 50(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 10680362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of population density and temporal variations in emissions on the air duality benefits of NOx emission trading. Nobel CE; McDonald-Buller EC; Kimura Y; Lumbley KE; Allen DT Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(16):3465-73. PubMed ID: 12214636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity analysis of ground-level ozone concentration to emission changes in two urban regions of southeast Texas. Lin CJ; Ho TC; Chu HW; Yang H; Chandru S; Krishnarajanagar N; Chiou P; Hopper JR J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 15854725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Location-Specific Control of Precursor Emissions to Mitigate Photochemical Air Pollution. Wang Y; Bastien L; Jin L; Harley RA Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 57(26):9693-9701. PubMed ID: 37329338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Future-year ozone prediction for the United States using updated models and inputs. Collet S; Kidokoro T; Karamchandani P; Shah T; Jung J J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Aug; 67(8):938-948. PubMed ID: 28379116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observations and impacts of transported Canadian wildfire smoke on ozone and aerosol air quality in the Maryland region on June 9-12, 2015. Dreessen J; Sullivan J; Delgado R J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):842-62. PubMed ID: 26963934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal ozone reduction policy design using adjoint-based NOx marginal damage information. Mesbah SM; Hakami A; Schott S Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(23):13528-35. PubMed ID: 24144173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air quality and source apportionment modeling of year 2017 ozone episodes in Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, New Mexico. Craig K; Erdakos G; Chang SY; Baringer L J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Nov; 70(11):1101-1120. PubMed ID: 32412852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements. Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions. Loughlin DH; Kaufman KR; Lenox CS; Hubbell BJ J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Sep; 65(9):1083-93. PubMed ID: 26091070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contributions of regional air pollutant emissions to ozone and fine particulate matter-related mortalities in eastern U.S. urban areas. Hou X; Strickland MJ; Liao KJ Environ Res; 2015 Feb; 137():475-84. PubMed ID: 25701729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]