These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24143935)
21. Modeled response of ozone to electricity generation emissions in the northeastern United States using three sensitivity techniques. Couzo E; McCann J; Vizuete W; Blumsack S; West JJ J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 May; 66(5):456-69. PubMed ID: 26796121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Source apportionment and health effect of NOx over the Pearl River Delta region in southern China. Lu X; Yao T; Li Y; Fung JCH; Lau AKH Environ Pollut; 2016 May; 212():135-146. PubMed ID: 26845361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Emission Increases on Surface Ozone Is Most Pronounced in the Central United States. Pozzer A; Schultz MG; Helmig D Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(19):12423-12433. PubMed ID: 32902267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimation of biogenic emissions with satellite-derived land use and land cover data for air quality modeling of Houston-Galveston ozone nonattainment area. Byun DW; Kim S; Czader B; Nowak D; Stetson S; Estes M J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):285-301. PubMed ID: 15854724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adjoint sensitivity analysis for a three-dimensional photochemical model: application to Southern California. Martien PT; Harley RA Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jul; 40(13):4200-10. PubMed ID: 16856736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Methodologies for estimating emissions for the U.S. EPA's NOx SIP call, CER rule, and other complexities. Majeed MA Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Nov; 35(22):4408-13. PubMed ID: 11757594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using air quality modeling to study source-receptor relationships between nitrogen oxides emissions and ozone exposures over the United States. Tong DQ; Muller NZ; Kan H; Mendelsohn RO Environ Int; 2009 Nov; 35(8):1109-17. PubMed ID: 19656569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Source apportionment of emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles and other sources in the United States for ozone and particulate matter. Vijayaraghavan K; Lindhjem C; Koo B; DenBleyker A; Tai E; Shah T; Alvarez Y; Yarwood G J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):98-119. PubMed ID: 26563640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intercomparison of chemical mechanisms for air quality policy formulation and assessment under North American conditions. Derwent R J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jul; 67(7):789-796. PubMed ID: 28278034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impacts of transportation sector emissions on future U.S. air quality in a changing climate. Part II: Air quality projections and the interplay between emissions and climate change. Campbell P; Zhang Y; Yan F; Lu Z; Streets D Environ Pollut; 2018 Jul; 238():918-930. PubMed ID: 29684896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modeling analyses of the effects of changes in nitrogen oxides emissions from the electric power sector on ozone levels in the eastern United States. Gégo E; Gilliland A; Godowitch J; Rao ST; Porter PS; Hogrefe C J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Apr; 58(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 18422044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of GRAPES-CUACE adjoint model version 2.0 and its application in sensitivity analysis of ozone pollution in north China. Wang C; An X; Zhao D; Sun Z; Jiang L; Li J; Hou Q Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():153879. PubMed ID: 35182623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Observed and Predicted Ozone in Multiple Urban Areas. Simon H; Wells B; Baker KR; Hubbell B Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Sep; 124(9):1443-52. PubMed ID: 27153213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The London low emission zone baseline study. Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatiotemporal trends in ground-level ozone concentrations and metrics in France over the time period 1999-2012. Sicard P; Serra R; Rossello P Environ Res; 2016 Aug; 149():122-144. PubMed ID: 27200478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does one size fit all? The suitability of standard ozone exposure metric conversion ratios and implications for epidemiology. Anderson GB; Bell ML J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 18985076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A direct sensitivity approach to predict hourly ozone resulting from compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Simon H; Baker KR; Akhtar F; Napelenok SL; Possiel N; Wells B; Timin B Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(5):2304-13. PubMed ID: 23256562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in ozone photochemical characteristics between the megacity Nanjing and its suburban surroundings, Yangtze River Delta, China. An J; Zou J; Wang J; Lin X; Zhu B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(24):19607-17. PubMed ID: 26272292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Responses in Ozone and Its Production Efficiency Attributable to Recent and Future Emissions Changes in the Eastern United States. Henneman LRF; Shen H; Liu C; Hu Y; Mulholland JA; Russell AG Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 51(23):13797-13805. PubMed ID: 29112386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impacts of Soil NO Sha T; Ma X; Zhang H; Janechek N; Wang Y; Wang Y; Castro García L; Jenerette GD; Wang J Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):7113-7122. PubMed ID: 33576617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]