These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24144448)

  • 1. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
    Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
    Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
    Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of virtual 18F-FDG PET/CT bronchoscopy for the detection of lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
    Herbrik M; Treffert J; Geiger B; Riegger C; Hartung V; Rosenbaum-Krumme SJ; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 52(10):1520-5. PubMed ID: 21908390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT using point spread function reconstruction for nodal staging of colorectal cancer.
    Kawashima K; Kato K; Tomabechi M; Matsuo M; Otsuka K; Ishida K; Nakamura R; Ehara S
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150938. PubMed ID: 27146065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does PET SUV Harmonization Affect PERCIST Response Classification?
    Quak E; Le Roux PY; Lasnon C; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 27283930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of reconstruction algorithms on semi-quantitative measurements in
    Özülker F; Babacan GB; Cengiz S; Özülker T
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2024; 27(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 39097805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
    Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on thoracic lymph node staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Lasnon C; Hicks RJ; Beauregard JM; Milner A; Paciencia M; Guizard AV; Bardet S; Gervais R; Lemoel G; Zalcman G; Aide N
    Clin Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 37(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 22899197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
    Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
    EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applications of both time of flight and point spread function in brain PET image reconstruction.
    Shao X; Shao X; Wang X; Wang Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Apr; 37(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 26637071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases.
    Rogasch JM; Steffen IG; Hofheinz F; Großer OS; Furth C; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Apostolova I; Amthauer H
    EJNMMI Res; 2015; 5():31. PubMed ID: 25992306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes of [
    Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of time-of-flight technique on the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Li CY; Klohr S; Sadick H; Weiss C; Hoermann K; Schoenberg SO; Sadick M
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Sep; 42(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 24970897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
    Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems?
    Bellevre D; Blanc Fournier C; Switsers O; Dugué AE; Levy C; Allouache D; Desmonts C; Crouet H; Guilloit JM; Grellard JM; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jun; 41(6):1103-12. PubMed ID: 24562642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Node/aorta and node/liver SUV ratios from (18)F-FDG PET/CT may improve the detection of occult mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.
    Kuo WH; Wu YC; Wu CY; Ho KC; Chiu PH; Wang CW; Chang CJ; Yu CT; Yen TC; Lin C
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 22459646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of
    Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
    Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.