196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24145305)
1. Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects.
Anez-Bustillos L; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Nazarian A; Tanck E
Bone; 2014 Jan; 58():160-7. PubMed ID: 24145305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Curved Beam Computed Tomography based Structural Rigidity Analysis of Bones with Simulated Lytic Defect: A Comparative Study with Finite Element Analysis.
Oftadeh R; Karimi Z; Villa-Camacho J; Tanck E; Verdonschot N; Goebel R; Snyder BD; Hashemi HN; Vaziri A; Nazarian A
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32397. PubMed ID: 27585495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis and computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis of rat tibia with simulated lytic defects.
Rennick JA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Kimbaris J; Tseng A; Masoudi A; Nayeb-Hashemi H; Vaziri A; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2701-9. PubMed ID: 23972429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.
Ataei A; Eggermont F; Verdonschot N; Lessmann N; Tanck E
Bone; 2024 Feb; 179():116987. PubMed ID: 38061504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case.
Lee T
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 35(4):642-50. PubMed ID: 17286207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-invasive assessment of failure torque in rat bones with simulated lytic lesions using computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis.
Entezari V; Basto PA; Vartanians V; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Nazarian A
J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(3):552-6. PubMed ID: 20926079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects.
Whealan KM; Kwak SD; Tedrow JR; Inoue K; Snyder BD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1240-51. PubMed ID: 11005515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel approach of predicting fracture load in the human proximal femur using non-invasive QCT imaging technique.
Lee T; Pereira BP; Chung YS; Oh HJ; Choi JB; Lim D; Shin JH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 37(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 19288197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting the strength of femoral shafts with and without metastatic lesions.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Rossi SA; Pejcic MR; Tehranzadeh J; Skinner HB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Oct; 439():161-70. PubMed ID: 16205155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model.
Haider IT; Goldak J; Frei H
Med Eng Phys; 2018 May; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 29551293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathological fracture prediction in patients with metastatic lesions can be improved with quantitative computed tomography based computer models.
Tanck E; van Aken JB; van der Linden YM; Schreuder HW; Binkowski M; Huizenga H; Verdonschot N
Bone; 2009 Oct; 45(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 19539798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?
van den Munckhof S; Zadpoor AA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 24485865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulated lesions representative of metastatic disease predict proximal femur failure strength more accurately than idealized lesions.
Johnson JE; Brouillette MJ; Permeswaran PT; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
J Biomech; 2020 Jun; 106():109825. PubMed ID: 32517984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
