These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24145556)

  • 1. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer.
    Murugesan V; Bypareddy R; Kumar M; Tanuj D; Anita P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 62(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 24145556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results.
    Abd Elaziz MS; Elsobky HM; Zaky AG; Hassan EAM; KhalafAllah MT
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31391006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer.
    Shin JY; Choi JS; Oh JY; Kim MK; Lee JH; Wee WR
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 20532138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different keratoplasty techniques on the biomechanical properties of the cornea.
    Abdelkader A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e567-72. PubMed ID: 23879240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty, and phacoemulsification.
    Rahimi M; Panahi Bazaz M; Sharifipour F; Hajizadeh M; Cheraghian B
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):3183-3190. PubMed ID: 35552955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism.
    Kirgiz A; Karaman Erdur S; Atalay K; Gurez C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30265255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics in Patıents with Behçet Disease.
    Cankaya C; Kalayci BN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 25392262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
    Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Yenerel NM; Kucumen RB; Gorgun E
    Cornea; 2010 Nov; 29(11):1247-51. PubMed ID: 20697286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure measurements and biomechanical properties of the cornea in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Fabian ID; Barequet IS; Skaat A; Rechtman E; Goldenfeld M; Roberts CJ; Melamed S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 151(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 21310386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of In Vivo Biomechanical Properties in Macular Corneal Dystrophy.
    Feizi S; Karjou Z; Abbasi H; Javadi MA; Azari AA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 215():8-13. PubMed ID: 32205123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multimodal ophthalmic analysis in patients with systemic sclerosis using ocular response analyzer, corneal topography and specular microscopy.
    Mayali H; Altinisik M; Sencan S; Pirildar T; Kurt E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 31564047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
    Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
    Çankaya AB; Kan S; Kizilgul M; Tokmak A; Inanc M; Caliskan M; Beyazyildiz E; Açar U; Delibaşı T
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):519-524. PubMed ID: 27423457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors.
    İnceoğlu N; Emre S; Ulusoy MO
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 28540493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.