These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24145867)

  • 1. Association of navicular drop and selected lower-limb biomechanical measures during the stance phase of running.
    Eslami M; Damavandi M; Ferber R
    J Appl Biomech; 2014 Apr; 30(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 24145867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Hinse S; Sadeghi H; Popov P; Allard P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 18768360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.
    Lee SY; Hertel J
    J Athl Train; 2012; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22488234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender differences in hip and ankle joint kinematics on knee abduction during running.
    Sakaguchi M; Ogawa H; Shimizu N; Kanehisa H; Yanai T; Kawakami Y
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14 Suppl 1():S302-9. PubMed ID: 24444222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of gait and speed on the dynamic navicular drop - A cross sectional study on healthy subjects.
    Pohl J; Jaspers T; Ferraro M; Krause F; Baur H; Eichelberger P
    Foot (Edinb); 2018 Sep; 36():67-73. PubMed ID: 30368194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interaction effect of different footwear types and static navicular drop or dynamic ankle pronation on the joint stiffness of the lower limb during running.
    Esmaeili A; Hosseininejad SE; Jafarnezhadgero A; Dionisio VC
    Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():28-34. PubMed ID: 37979323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased unilateral foot pronation affects lower limbs and pelvic biomechanics during walking.
    Resende RA; Deluzio KJ; Kirkwood RN; Hassan EA; Fonseca ST
    Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 25468683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance training is accompanied by increases in hip strength and changes in lower extremity biomechanics during running.
    Snyder KR; Earl JE; O'Connor KM; Ebersole KT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jan; 24(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19013697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in static and dynamic measures in evaluation of talonavicular mobility in gait.
    Dicharry JM; Franz JR; Della Croce U; Wilder RP; Riley PO; Kerrigan DC
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 39(8):628-34. PubMed ID: 19648718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contributions to the understanding of gait control.
    Simonsen EB
    Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tibial rotation in running: Does rearfoot adduction matter?
    Fischer KM; Willwacher S; Hamill J; Brüggemann GP
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():188-193. PubMed ID: 27810691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
    Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary mechanical factors contributing to foot eversion moment during the stance phase of running.
    Tsujimoto N; Nunome H; Ikegami Y
    J Sports Sci; 2017 May; 35(9):898-905. PubMed ID: 27362583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of motion control shoes on the running gait of mature and young females.
    Lilley K; Stiles V; Dixon S
    Gait Posture; 2013 Mar; 37(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23122596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Arch-Taping Techniques for Altering Navicular Height and Plantar Pressures During Activity.
    Newell T; Simon J; Docherty CL
    J Athl Train; 2015 Aug; 50(8):825-32. PubMed ID: 26098272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of treadmill running velocity on lower extremity coordination variability in healthy runners.
    Bailey JP; Freedman Silvernail J; Dufek JS; Navalta J; Mercer JA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Oct; 61():144-150. PubMed ID: 30092396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can orthoses and navicular drop affect foot motion patterns during running?
    Eslami M; Ferber R
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jul; 16(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 23137859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthoses posted in both the forefoot and rearfoot reduce moments and angular impulses on lower extremity joints during walking.
    Hsu WH; Lewis CL; Monaghan GM; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2618-25. PubMed ID: 24968944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tibial plateau geometry influences lower extremity biomechanics during landing.
    Shultz SJ; Schmitz RJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2029-36. PubMed ID: 22837428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.