405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24146148)
1. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cradle-to-farm gate environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Rotz CA; Asem-Hiablie S; Dillon J; Bonifacio H
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2509-19. PubMed ID: 26020346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic and environmental feasibility of a perennial cow dairy farm.
Rotz CA; Zartman DL; Crandall KL
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Aug; 88(8):3009-19. PubMed ID: 16027215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.
White RR; Capper JL
J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5801-12. PubMed ID: 24146151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic and environmental impact of four levels of concentrate supplementation in grazing dairy herds.
Soder KJ; Rotz CA
J Dairy Sci; 2001 Nov; 84(11):2560-72. PubMed ID: 11768100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.
Capper JL
J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):4249-61. PubMed ID: 21803973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sustainability of meat production beyond carbon footprint: a synthesis of case studies from grazing systems in Uruguay.
Picasso VD; Modernel PD; Becoña G; Salvo L; Gutiérrez L; Astigarraga L
Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 25048094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of feeding corn modified wet distillers grain plus solubles co-ensiled with chopped whole plant corn on heifer growth performance and diet digestibility in beef cattle.
Arias RP; Unruh-Snyder LJ; Scholljegerdes EJ; Baird AN; Johnson KD; Buckmaster D; Lemenager RP; Lake SL
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4366-73. PubMed ID: 23825340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.
Capper JL; Hayes DJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3527-37. PubMed ID: 22665660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alpharma Beef Cattle Nutrition Symposium: implications of nutritional management for beef cow-calf systems.
Funston RN; Summers AF; Roberts AJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Jul; 90(7):2301-7. PubMed ID: 22021812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stocking rate and corn gluten feed supplementation on performance of young beef cows grazing winter-stockpiled tall fescue-red clover pasture.
Driskill R; Russell JR; Strohbehn DR; Morrical DG; Barnhart SK; Lawrence JD
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1577-86. PubMed ID: 17296771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 2011 and 2012 Early Careers Achievement Awards: improving the production, environmental, and economic efficiency of the stocker cattle industry in the southeastern United States.
Beck PA; Anders M; Watkins B; Gunter SA; Hubbell D; Gadberry MS
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jun; 91(6):2456-66. PubMed ID: 23243161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.
Klopatek SC; Marvinney E; Duarte T; Kendall A; Yang XC; Oltjen JW
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 34936699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of net protein contribution, methane production, and net returns from beef production as duration of confinement increases in the cow-calf sector1.
Baber JR; Sawyer JE; Wickersham TA
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2675-2686. PubMed ID: 31028380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ASAS-CSAS ANNUAL MEETING SYMPOSIUM ON WATER USE EFFICIENCY AT THE FORAGE-ANIMAL INTERFACE: Life cycle assessment of forage-based livestock production systems.
Philipp D; Putman B; Thoma G
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1865-1873. PubMed ID: 30689888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of roughage concentration in dry-rolled corn-based diets containing wet distillers grains with solubles on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers.
Hales KE; Freetly HC; Shackelford SD; King DA
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3315-21. PubMed ID: 23798521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
