These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24146356)

  • 1. Appraising the risk matrix 2000 static sex offender risk assessment tool.
    Tully RJ; Browne KD
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Feb; 59(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 24146356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.
    Bartosh DL; Garby T; Lewis D; Gray S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of the interrater reliability between practitioners and researchers on the static-99.
    Quesada SP; Calkins C; Jeglic EL
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Nov; 58(11):1364-75. PubMed ID: 23864524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exploration of the latent constructs of the STATIC-99.
    Allen BP; Pflugradt DM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Nov; 58(11):1376-88. PubMed ID: 23864523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.
    Olver ME; Wong SC; Nicholaichuk T; Gordon A
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Sep; 19(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 17845123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R?
    Looman J; Morphett NA; Abracen J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland.
    Gonçalves LC; Gerth J; Rossegger A; Noll T; Endrass J
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Mar; 32(2):203-219. PubMed ID: 30623752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next?
    Hempel I; Buck N; Cima M; van Marle H
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Feb; 57(2):208-28. PubMed ID: 22147101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization and prediction of sexual and nonsexual recidivism among adjudicated juvenile sex offenders.
    Christiansen AK; Vincent JP
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):506-29. PubMed ID: 23703937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Evaluation of the Reliability, Construct Validity, and Factor Structure of the Static-2002R.
    Jung S; Ennis L; Hermann CA; Pham AT; Choy AL; Corabian G; Hook T
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2017 Mar; 61(4):464-487. PubMed ID: 26169567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of actuarial procedures for assessment of sexual offender recidivism risk may vary across ethnicity.
    Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2004 Apr; 16(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 15208896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.
    Wollert R; Cramer E; Waggoner J; Skelton A; Vess J
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.