These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24147849)
21. Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO. Verdaasdonk EG; Stassen LP; Monteny LJ; Dankelman J Surg Endosc; 2006 Mar; 20(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 16437275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new possibility in thoracoscopic virtual reality simulation training: development and testing of a novel virtual reality simulator for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Jensen K; Bjerrum F; Hansen HJ; Petersen RH; Pedersen JH; Konge L Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 21(4):420-6. PubMed ID: 26162895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of a Virtual Reality-Based Hip Arthroscopy Simulator. Bauer DE; Wieser K; Aichmair A; Zingg PO; Dora C; Rahm S Arthroscopy; 2019 Mar; 35(3):789-795. PubMed ID: 30733023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Augmented reality simulator for ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal access. Mu Y; Hocking D; Wang ZT; Garvin GJ; Eagleson R; Peters TM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 May; 15(5):749-757. PubMed ID: 32314227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of the updated ArthroS simulator: face and construct validity of a passive haptic virtual reality simulator with novel performance metrics. Garfjeld Roberts P; Guyver P; Baldwin M; Akhtar K; Alvand A; Price AJ; Rees JL Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Feb; 25(2):616-625. PubMed ID: 27085361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator. Bright E; Vine S; Wilson MR; Masters RS; McGrath JS Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 22366646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the educational value of a virtual reality TURP simulator according to a curriculum-based approach. Tjiam IM; Berkers CH; Schout BM; Brinkman WM; Witjes JA; Scherpbier AJ; Hendrikx AJ; Koldewijn EL Simul Healthc; 2014 Oct; 9(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 25275719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of performance measures and learning curves for use of a virtual-reality ultrasound simulator in transvaginal ultrasound examination. Madsen ME; Konge L; Nørgaard LN; Tabor A; Ringsted C; Klemmensen AK; Ottesen B; Tolsgaard MG Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 44(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 24789453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality intravenous insertion simulator. Reznek MA; Rawn CL; Krummel TM Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1319-25. PubMed ID: 12414488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Face, Content, and Construct Validity of a Virtual Reality Otoscopy Simulator and Applicability to Medical Training. Albrecht T; Nikendei C; Praetorius M Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Apr; 166(4):753-759. PubMed ID: 34313515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The virtual reality endourologic simulator is realistic and useful for educational purposes. Dolmans VE; Schout BM; de Beer NA; Bemelmans BL; Scherpbier AJ; Hendrikx AJ J Endourol; 2009 Jul; 23(7):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19530899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Face, Content, and Construct Validations of Endoscopic Needle Injection Simulator for Transurethral Bulking Agent in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. Farhan B; Soltani T; Do R; Perez C; Choi H; Ghoniem G J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1673-1678. PubMed ID: 29730182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Construct validity and expert benchmarking of the haptic virtual reality dental simulator. Suebnukarn S; Chaisombat M; Kongpunwijit T; Rhienmora P J Dent Educ; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1442-50. PubMed ID: 25281678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Face and content validation of a Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST™). Dorozhkin D; Nemani A; Roberts K; Ahn W; Halic T; Dargar S; Wang J; Cao CG; Sankaranarayanan G; De S Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5529-5536. PubMed ID: 27129546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]