These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24148081)

  • 1. Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.
    Anthonioz A; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24148081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of poroscopy among South Indian population.
    Preethi DS; Nithin MD; Manjunatha B; Balaraj BM
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 22335766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
    Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.
    Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: a field study.
    Neumann C; Mateos-Garcia I; Langenburg G; Kostroski J; Skerrett JE; Koolen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):32-46. PubMed ID: 21640531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.
    Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):106-17. PubMed ID: 23313600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Latent fingerprint matching.
    Jain AK; Feng J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 Jan; 33(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 21088321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford H; Champod C; Koertner A; Eldridge H; Salyards M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110703. PubMed ID: 33524851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method for the statistical interpretation of friction ridge skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.
    Swofford HJ; Koertner AJ; Zemp F; Ausdemore M; Liu A; Salyards MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():113-126. PubMed ID: 29655097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not all identification conclusions are equal: Quantifying the strength of fingerprint decisions.
    Busey T; Coon M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Feb; 343():111543. PubMed ID: 36610212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring coherence of computer-assisted likelihood ratio methods.
    Haraksim R; Ramos D; Meuwly D; Berger CE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():123-32. PubMed ID: 25698513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The permanence of friction ridge skin and persistence of friction ridge skin and impressions: A comprehensive review and new results.
    Monson KL; Roberts MA; Knorr KB; Ali S; Meagher SB; Biggs K; Blume P; Brandelli D; Marzioli A; Reneau R; Tarasi F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():111-131. PubMed ID: 30784948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.