864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24148563)
1. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of qualitative shear-wave elastography according to different color map opacities for breast masses.
Kim H; Youk JH; Gweon HM; Kim JA; Son EJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e326-31. PubMed ID: 23545451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Yoon JH; Kim MH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):730-6. PubMed ID: 21343520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
