These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24149160)

  • 21. Test-Retest Reliability and Physiological Responses Associated with the Steep Ramp Anaerobic Test in Patients with COPD.
    Chura RL; Marciniuk DD; Clemens R; Butcher SJ
    Pulm Med; 2012; 2012():653831. PubMed ID: 22720154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Familiarization, reliability, and comparability of a 40-m maximal shuttle run test.
    Glaister M; Hauck H; Abraham CS; Merry KL; Beaver D; Woods B; McInnes G
    J Sports Sci Med; 2009; 8(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 24150559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Influence of Familiarization on Physical Fitness Test Results in Primary School-Aged Children.
    Vrbik I; Sporiš G; Štefan L; Madić D; Trajković N; Valantine I; Milanović Z
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2017 May; 29(2):278-284. PubMed ID: 27768554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of a 6-s maximal cycling sprint test.
    Mendez-Villanueva A; Bishop D; Hamer P
    J Sci Med Sport; 2007 Oct; 10(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 16949868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of load on wingate test performances and reliability.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Coudrat L; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3462-8. PubMed ID: 24936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Kansas Squat Test Modality Comparison: Free Weights vs. Smith Machine.
    Luebbers PE; Fry AC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Aug; 30(8):2186-93. PubMed ID: 26950349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Familiarization and reliability of multiple sprint running performance indices.
    Glaister M; Howatson G; Lockey RA; Abraham CS; Goodwin JE; McInnes G
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Aug; 21(3):857-9. PubMed ID: 17685700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Test-Retest Reliability of Static and Countermovement Power Push-Up Tests in Young Male Athletes.
    Bohannon NA; Gillen ZM; Shoemaker ME; McKay BD; Gibson SM; Cramer JT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Sep; 34(9):2456-2464. PubMed ID: 32865943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability and Validity of a New Test of Change-of-Direction Speed for Field-Based Sports: the Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Test (CODAT).
    Lockie RG; Schultz AB; Callaghan SJ; Jeffriess MD; Berry SP
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 24149730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anaerobic Capacity is Associated with Metabolic Contribution and Mechanical Output Measured During the Wingate Test.
    de Poli RAB; Miyagi WE; Zagatto AM
    J Hum Kinet; 2021 Jul; 79():65-75. PubMed ID: 34400987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of a 3-min all-out Arm Crank Ergometer Exercise Test.
    Flueck JL; Lienert M; Schaufelberger F; Perret C
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 36(10):809-13. PubMed ID: 26038881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of specific anaerobic power in 12-14-year-old male rowers.
    Mikulić P; Ruzić L; Marković G
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Nov; 12(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 18762452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Taekwondo Anaerobic Intermittent Kick Test: Discriminant Validity and an Update with the Gold-Standard Wingate Test.
    Tayech A; Mejri MA; Chaouachi M; Chaabene H; Hambli M; Brughelli M; Behm DG; Chaouachi A
    J Hum Kinet; 2020 Jan; 71():229-242. PubMed ID: 32148587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability and Validity of a Novel Futsal Special Performance Test Designed to Measure Skills and Anaerobic Performance.
    Farhani F; Rajabi H; Negaresh R; Ali A; Amani Shalamzari S; Baker JS
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Sep; 14(8):1096-1102. PubMed ID: 30702380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between body composition, leg strength, anaerobic power, and on-ice skating performance in division I men's hockey athletes.
    Potteiger JA; Smith DL; Maier ML; Foster TS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1755-62. PubMed ID: 20543730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative analysis of two different methods of anaerobic capacity assessment in sedentary young men.
    Klasnja A; Drapsin M; Lukac D; Drid P; Obadov S; Grujić N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20361697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability of power output during eccentric sprint cycling.
    Brughelli M; Van Leemputte M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jan; 27(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 22344057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standard anaerobic exercise tests.
    Vandewalle H; Pérès G; Monod H
    Sports Med; 1987; 4(4):268-89. PubMed ID: 3306867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of the Wingate anaerobic mechanical power outputs from a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise stress test using machine-learning approach.
    Leopold E; Navot-Mintzer D; Shargal E; Tsuk S; Tuller T; Scheinowitz M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212199. PubMed ID: 30861009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.