These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24149732)

  • 1. Reliability of the Woodway Curve(TM) Non-Motorized Treadmill for Assessing Anaerobic Performance.
    Gonzalez AM; Wells AJ; Hoffman JR; Stout JR; Fragala MS; Mangine GT; McCormack WP; Townsend JR; Jajtner AR; Emerson NS; Robinson Iv EH
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 24149732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and Validity of a New Portable Tethered Sprint Running Test as a Measure of Maximal Anaerobic Performance.
    Limmer M; Berkholz A; de Marées M; Platen P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Aug; 34(8):2197-2204. PubMed ID: 30946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the dynavision™ d2 for assessing reaction time performance.
    Wells AJ; Hoffman JR; Beyer KS; Jajtner AR; Gonzalez AM; Townsend JR; Mangine GT; Robinson EH; McCormack WP; Fragala MS; Stout JR
    J Sports Sci Med; 2014 Jan; 13(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 24570618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speed, force, and power values produced from nonmotorized treadmill test are related to sprinting performance.
    Mangine GT; Hoffman JR; Gonzalez AM; Wells AJ; Townsend JR; Jajtner AR; McCormack WP; Robinson EH; Fragala MS; Fukuda DH; Stout JR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Jul; 28(7):1812-9. PubMed ID: 24950225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a diurnal variation in repeated sprint ability on a non-motorised treadmill?
    Pullinger SA; Brocklehurst EL; Iveson RP; Burniston JG; Doran DA; Waterhouse JM; Edwards BJ
    Chronobiol Int; 2014 Apr; 31(3):421-32. PubMed ID: 24328815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarization Effects of an Elliptical All-out Test and the Wingate Test Based on Mechanical Power Indices.
    Ozkaya O
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 24149160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A self-paced intermittent protocol on a non-motorised treadmill: a reliable alternative to assessing team-sport running performance.
    Tofari PJ; McLean BD; Kemp J; Cormack S
    J Sports Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 14(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 25729291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and Validity of a New Test of Change-of-Direction Speed for Field-Based Sports: the Change-of-Direction and Acceleration Test (CODAT).
    Lockie RG; Schultz AB; Callaghan SJ; Jeffriess MD; Berry SP
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 24149730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of an Anaerobic Sprint Running Test Using a Nonmotorized Treadmill.
    McLain TA; Wright GA; Camic CL; Kovacs AJ; Hegge JM; Brice GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2197-204. PubMed ID: 25627645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of the Hawaii anaerobic run test.
    Kimura IF; Stickley CD; Lentz MA; Wages JJ; Yanagi K; Hetzler RK
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 May; 28(5):1386-93. PubMed ID: 24126898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of cycling peak power as measured by a short-sprint test versus the Wingate anaerobic test.
    Coso JD; Mora-Rodríguez R
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Jun; 31(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 16770343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes.
    McGawley K; Bishop D
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Nov; 98(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 16955291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriate loads for peak-power during resisted sprinting on a non-motorized treadmill.
    Andre MJ; Fry AC; Lane MT
    J Hum Kinet; 2013; 38():161-7. PubMed ID: 24233103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing in persons with complete paraplegia.
    Jacobs PL; Mahoney ET; Johnson B
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2003; 26(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 12828291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of maximal anaerobic running tests on a treadmill and track.
    Nummela A; Hämäläinen I; Rusko H
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Jan; 25(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 17127584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra-Session Reliability of Sprint Performance on a Non-Motorised Treadmill for Healthy Active Males and Females.
    Doma K; Connor JD; Nakamura FY; Leicht AS
    J Hum Kinet; 2023 Jul; 87():163-171. PubMed ID: 37559768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sprinting performance on the Woodway Curve 3.0 is related to muscle architecture.
    Mangine GT; Fukuda DH; Townsend JR; Wells AJ; Gonzalez AM; Jajtner AR; Bohner JD; LaMonica M; Hoffman JR; Fragala MS; Stout JR
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2015; 15(7):606-14. PubMed ID: 25334069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wingate Anaerobic Test Reliability on the Velotron With Ice Hockey Players.
    Bringhurst RF; Wagner DR; Schwartz S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1716-1722. PubMed ID: 29385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiarization, reliability, and comparability of a 40-m maximal shuttle run test.
    Glaister M; Hauck H; Abraham CS; Merry KL; Beaver D; Woods B; McInnes G
    J Sports Sci Med; 2009; 8(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 24150559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.