325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24150192)
1. Stroke volume variation in hepatic resection: a replacement for standard central venous pressure monitoring.
Dunki-Jacobs EM; Philips P; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Martin RC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 24150192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of stroke volume variation during hepatic resection under infrahepatic inferior vena cava and portal triad clamping.
Harimoto N; Matsuyama H; Kajiyama K; Nagaie T; Ikegami T; Yoshizumi T; Soejima Y; Shirabe K; Ikeda T; Kawanaka H; Uchiyama H; Yamashita Y; Morita M; Oki E; Saeki H; Maehara Y
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 2013 Oct; 104(10):362-9. PubMed ID: 24511667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial.
Ratti F; Cipriani F; Reineke R; Catena M; Paganelli M; Comotti L; Beretta L; Aldrighetti L
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Feb; 18(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 26902132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections.
Smyrniotis V; Kostopanagiotou G; Theodoraki K; Tsantoulas D; Contis JC
Am J Surg; 2004 Mar; 187(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 15006570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stroke Volume Variation-Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure-Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.
Lee J; Kim WH; Ryu HG; Lee HC; Chung EJ; Yang SM; Jung CW
Anesth Analg; 2017 Aug; 125(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 28632543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative circulatory management using the FloTrac™ system in laparoscopic liver resection.
Kitaguchi K; Gotohda N; Yamamoto H; Kato Y; Takahashi S; Konishi M; Hayashi R
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2015 May; 8(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 25470208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of a central venous catheter during hepatic surgery.
Stéphan F; Rezaiguia-Delclaux S
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Mar; 52(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 18269388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The comparison between stroke volume variation and filling pressure as an estimate of right ventricular preload in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Toyoda D; Fukuda M; Iwasaki R; Terada T; Sato N; Ochiai R; Kotake Y
J Anesth; 2015 Feb; 29(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24962946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients.
Xu Q; Yan J; Cai G; Chen J; Li L; Hu C
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24451954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stroke volume variation does not correlate with central venous pressure during hepatectomy.
Parra-Membrives P; Lorente-Herce JM; Jiménez-Riera G; Martínez-Baena D
HPB (Oxford); 2023 May; 25(5):518-520. PubMed ID: 36822927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative methods to central venous pressure for assessing volume status in critically ill patients.
Stoneking L; Deluca LA; Fiorello AB; Munzer B; Baker N; Denninghoff KR
J Emerg Nurs; 2014 Mar; 40(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 23089635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness of stroke volume variation and central venous pressure during acute normovolemic and hypervolemic hemodilution.
Ji FH; Li WJ; Li J; Peng K; Yang JP; Liu H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(10):1838-43. PubMed ID: 23673096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of intravascular volume depression and possible hypotension during the early postoperative period after esophagectomy.
Kobayashi M; Koh M; Irinoda T; Meguro E; Hayakawa Y; Takagane A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1371-7. PubMed ID: 19219508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of absolute fluid restriction versus relative volume redistribution strategy in low central venous pressure anesthesia in liver resection surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Zatloukal J; Pradl R; Kletecka J; Skalicky T; Liska V; Benes J
Minerva Anestesiol; 2017 Oct; 83(10):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 28421732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Central venous pressure monitoring during living right donor hepatectomy.
Niemann CU; Feiner J; Behrends M; Eilers H; Ascher NL; Roberts JP
Liver Transpl; 2007 Feb; 13(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 17256757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation for the accuracy of evaluating volume].
Liu N; Gu Q; Yu JF
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2012 Jul; 24(7):419-22. PubMed ID: 22748459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stroke volume variation obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac™ system during bleeding and fluid overload in dogs.
Taguchi H; Ichinose K; Tanimoto H; Sugita M; Tashiro M; Yamamoto T
J Anesth; 2011 Aug; 25(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 21643786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
