These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24150435)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain: a Norwegian multicenter RCT.
    Johnsen LG; Hellum C; Storheim K; Nygaard ØP; Brox JI; Rossvoll I; Rø M; Andresen H; Lydersen S; Grundnes O; Pedersen M; Leivseth G; Olafsson G; Borgström F; Fritzell P;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 24150435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial.
    Rivero-Arias O; Campbell H; Gray A; Fairbank J; Frost H; Wilson-MacDonald J
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7502):1239. PubMed ID: 15911536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
    Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of cervical total disc replacement vs fusion for the treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
    Ament JD; Yang Z; Nunley P; Stone MB; Kim KD
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Dec; 149(12):1231-9. PubMed ID: 25321869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain.
    Soegaard R; Bünger CE; Christiansen T; Høy K; Eiskjaer SP; Christensen FB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2405-14. PubMed ID: 18090078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost effectiveness of disc prosthesis versus lumbar fusion in patients with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Fritzell P; Berg S; Borgström F; Tullberg T; Tropp H
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Jul; 20(7):1001-11. PubMed ID: 21053028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.
    Radcliff K; Lerner J; Yang C; Bernard T; Zigler JE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26824587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
    Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On total disc replacement.
    Berg S
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2011 Feb; 82(343):1-29. PubMed ID: 21542779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials.
    Mannion AF; Brox JI; Fairbank JC
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1438-48. PubMed ID: 24200413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar artificial intervertebral disc replacement: driven by the choice of comparator.
    Parkinson B; Goodall S; Thavaneswaran P
    ANZ J Surg; 2013 Sep; 83(9):669-75. PubMed ID: 23190445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery.
    Glassman SD; Polly DW; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20489676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty versus standard medical treatment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a Swedish multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Fritzell P; Ohlin A; Borgström F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2243-51. PubMed ID: 21912321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain.
    Soegaard R; Christensen FB; Christiansen T; Bünger C
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 16871387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
    Richardson SS; Berven S
    Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-utility analysis of a three-month exercise programme vs usual care following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.
    Henchoz Y; Pinget C; Wasserfallen JB; Paillex R; de Goumoëns P; Norberg M; Kai-Lik So A
    J Rehabil Med; 2010 Oct; 42(9):846-52. PubMed ID: 20878045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.