These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24150917)

  • 1. The policy chicken and the science egg. Has applied ecology failed the transgenic crops debate?
    Gray AJ
    Transgenic Res; 2014 Dec; 23(6):923-32. PubMed ID: 24150917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can science justify regulatory decisions about the cultivation of transgenic crops?
    Raybould A
    Transgenic Res; 2012 Aug; 21(4):691-8. PubMed ID: 22476694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.
    Devos Y; Sanvido O; Tait J; Raybould A
    Transgenic Res; 2014 Dec; 23(6):933-43. PubMed ID: 24030046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach.
    Garcia-Alonso M; Raybould A
    Transgenic Res; 2014 Dec; 23(6):945-56. PubMed ID: 24154954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science-practice interface in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Apr; 34(2):449-461. PubMed ID: 30350891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transgenic crops for the agricultural improvement in Pakistan: a perspective of environmental stresses and the current status of genetically modified crops.
    Babar U; Nawaz MA; Arshad U; Azhar MT; Atif RM; Golokhvast KS; Tsatsakis AM; Shcerbakova K; Chung G; Rana IA
    GM Crops Food; 2020; 11(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 31679447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic misconception: a fresh look at the biosafety of transgenic and conventional crops. A plea for a process agnostic regulation.
    Ammann K
    N Biotechnol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 23684919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Transgenic Res; 2011 Dec; 20(6):1191-201. PubMed ID: 21607784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops.
    Herman RA; Garcia-Alonso M; Layton R; Raybould A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 23973171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment?
    Raybould A
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21912209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between environmental advocacy, values, and science: a survey of ecological scientists' attitudes.
    Reiners DS; Reiners WA; Lockwood JA
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1226-42. PubMed ID: 23967588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science policy and society: the British debate over GM agriculture.
    Gaskell G
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 15(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15193333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weed control changes and genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops in the USA 1996-2012.
    Brookes G
    GM Crops Food; 2014; 5(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 25523177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cumulative impact of GM herbicide-tolerant cropping on arable plants assessed through species-based and functional taxonomies.
    Squire GR; Hawes C; Begg GS; Young MW
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19048321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations: objectives and barriers.
    Raybould A; Poppy GM
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 22430852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries.
    Sinebo W; Maredia K
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Jan; 7(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26954893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Farmer knowledge and a priori risk analysis: pre-release evaluation of genetically modified Roundup Ready wheat across the Canadian prairies.
    Mauro IJ; McLachlan SM; Van Acker RC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Sep; 16(6):689-701. PubMed ID: 19475440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK.
    Augoustinos M; Crabb S; Shepherd R
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jan; 19(1):98-114. PubMed ID: 20533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.
    Sanvido O; Romeis J; Bigler F
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():235-78. PubMed ID: 17522828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.