These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24151138)

  • 21. A cautionary note concerning the use of stabilized weights in marginal structural models.
    Talbot D; Atherton J; Rossi AM; Bacon SL; Lefebvre G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):812-23. PubMed ID: 25410264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Z-estimation and stratified samples: application to survival models.
    Breslow NE; Hu J; Wellner JA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Oct; 21(4):493-516. PubMed ID: 25588605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relation between three classes of structural models for the effect of a time-varying exposure on survival.
    Young JG; Hernán MA; Picciotto S; Robins JM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2010 Jan; 16(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 19894116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confounding-adjustment methods for the causal difference in medians.
    Shepherd DA; Baer BR; Moreno-Betancur M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):288. PubMed ID: 38062364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model.
    Klungsøyr O; Sexton J; Sandanger I; Nygård JF
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Jun; 15(2):278-94. PubMed ID: 19109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust standardization in the relative survival framework.
    Syriopoulou E; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6069-6092. PubMed ID: 34523751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies.
    Karim ME; Petkau J; Gustafson P; Platt RW; Tremlett H;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1709-1722. PubMed ID: 27659168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.
    Zeldow B; Hatfield LA
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 56(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33978956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Missing Data in Marginal Structural Models: A Plasmode Simulation Study Comparing Multiple Imputation and Inverse Probability Weighting.
    Liu SH; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Chang Q; Hunnicutt JN; Lapane KL
    Med Care; 2019 Mar; 57(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 30664611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
    Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inverse probability weighting methods for Cox regression with right-truncated data.
    Vakulenko-Lagun B; Mandel M; Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):484-495. PubMed ID: 31621059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.
    Lu B; Cai D; Tong X
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 29399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of the causal effects of time-varying treatments in nested case-control studies using marginal structural Cox models.
    Takeuchi Y; Hagiwawa Y; Komukai S; Matsuyama Y
    Biometrics; 2024 Jan; 80(1):. PubMed ID: 38465985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robust versus consistent variance estimators in marginal structural Cox models.
    Enders D; Engel S; Linder R; Pigeot I
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3455-3470. PubMed ID: 29888510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 2. PubMed ID: 21969992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating long-term treatment effects in observational data: A comparison of the performance of different methods under real-world uncertainty.
    Newsome SJ; Keogh RH; Daniel RM
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(15):2367-2390. PubMed ID: 29671915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.