BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

755 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24151264)

  • 1. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
    Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.
    Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.
    Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W
    Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing in Patients 45 Years of Age and Younger at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Dowding C; Dobransky JS; Kim PR; Beaulé PE
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Oct; 33(10):3196-3200. PubMed ID: 29914818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
    Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip replacement.
    Schouten R; Malone AA; Tiffen C; Frampton CM; Hooper G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11):1462-7. PubMed ID: 23109623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hip Resurfacing Compared with 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement: A Randomized Study with 15 Years of Follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Shahin M; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lavigne M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Nov; 102(Suppl 2):80-90. PubMed ID: 32554999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K
    Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised controlled trial of cemented and cementless femoral components for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a bone mineral density study.
    Tice A; Kim P; Dinh L; Ryu JJ; Beaulé PE
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1608-14. PubMed ID: 26637673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V
    Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
    Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
    Milošev I; Kovač S; Trebše R; Levašič V; Pišot V
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Oct; 94(19):1756-63. PubMed ID: 23032586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients.
    Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2705-11. PubMed ID: 18056503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips.
    Canadian Arthroplasty Society
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High rate of revision and a high incidence of radiolucent lines around Metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacements: results from a randomised controlled trial of three bearings after seven years.
    Bjorgul K; Novicoff WN; Andersen ST; Ahlund OR; Bunes A; Wiig M; Brevig K
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 23814237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.