617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24151754)
1. Upper 'J' ministernotomy versus full sternotomy: an easier approach for aortic valve reoperation.
Mikus E; Calvi S; Tripodi A; Lamarra M; Del Giglio M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 May; 22(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24151754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy.
Pineda AM; Santana O; Reyna J; Sarria A; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jan; 22(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23610989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis.
Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
Gersak B; Sutlic Z
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. A safe and useful technique beyond the cosmetic benefits.
Paredes FA; Cánovas SJ; Gil O; García-Fuster R; Hornero F; Vázquez A; Martín E; Mena A; Martínez-León J
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Sep; 66(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 24773674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.
Hassan M; Miao Y; Maraey A; Lincoln J; Brown S; Windsor J; Ricci M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Sep; 24(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 26897831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Santana O; Reyna J; Benjo AM; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Oct; 42(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 22555309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques.
Mahesh B; Navaratnarajah M; Mensah K; Ilsley C; Amrani M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Nov; 20(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 22655495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy surgery for native mitral valve infective endocarditis.
Mihos CG; Santana O; Pineda AM; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 25296460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a minimally invasive approach on reoperative aortic valve replacement.
Gosev I; Neely RC; Leacche M; McGurk S; Kaneko T; Zeljko D; Loberman D; Javed Q; Cohn LH; Aranki SF
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Mar; 24(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26204682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive approach for complex cardiac surgery procedures.
Totaro P; Carlini S; Pozzi M; Pagani F; Zattera G; D'Armini AM; Vigano M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 88(2):462-6; discussion 467. PubMed ID: 19632394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience with a minimally invasive approach to combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting through bilateral thoracotomies.
Smit PJ; Shariff MA; Nabagiez JP; Khan MA; Sadel SM; McGinn JT
Heart Surg Forum; 2013 Jun; 16(3):E125-31. PubMed ID: 23803234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement.
Detter C; Deuse T; Boehm DH; Reichenspurner H; Reichart B
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Dec; 50(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 12457309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).
Aliahmed HMA; Karalius R; Valaika A; Grebelis A; Semėnienė P; Čypienė R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2018 Apr; 54(2):. PubMed ID: 30344257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini-Bentall: An Interesting Approach for Selected Patients.
Mikus E; Micari A; Calvi S; Salomone M; Panzavolta M; Paris M; Del Giglio M
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 28129319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
