BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24152366)

  • 1. [Choices for women at risk of hereditary breast cancer].
    Saadatmand S; Obdeijn IM; Koppert LB; Tilanus-Linthorst M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(43):A6625. PubMed ID: 24152366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    Krammer J; Pinker-Domenig K; Robson ME; Gönen M; Bernard-Davila B; Morris EA; Mangino DA; Jochelson MS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 28343309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relevance and efficacy of breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers above 60 years: a national cohort study.
    Saadatmand S; Vos JR; Hooning MJ; Oosterwijk JC; Koppert LB; de Bock GH; Ausems MG; van Asperen CJ; Aalfs CM; Gómez Garcia EB; Meijers-Heijboer H; Hoogerbrugge N; Piek M; Seynaeve C; Verhoef C; Rookus M; Tilanus-Linthorst MM;
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 135(12):2940-9. PubMed ID: 24789418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers after risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
    Fakkert IE; Jansen L; Meijer K; Kok T; Oosterwijk JC; Mourits MJ; de Bock GH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 129(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 21373873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography screening and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective study.
    Giannakeas V; Lubinski J; Gronwald J; Moller P; Armel S; Lynch HT; Foulkes WD; Kim-Sing C; Singer C; Neuhausen SL; Friedman E; Tung N; Senter L; Sun P; Narod SA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Aug; 147(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 25082516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.
    van Zelst JCM; Mus RDM; Woldringh G; Rutten MJCM; Bult P; Vreemann S; de Jong M; Karssemeijer N; Hoogerbrugge N; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):376-388. PubMed ID: 28609204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five screening-detected breast cancer cases in initially disease-free BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    Shimada S; Yoshida R; Nakashima E; Kitagawa D; Gomi N; Horii R; Takeuchi S; Ashihara Y; Kita M; Akiyama F; Ohno S; Saito M; Arai M
    Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):846-851. PubMed ID: 30980249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective blinded surveillance screening of Swedish women with increased hereditary risk of breast cancer.
    Liljegren A; von Wachenfeldt A; Azavedo E; Eloranta S; Grundström H; Ståhlbom AK; Sundbom A; Sundén P; Svane G; Ulitzsch D; Arver B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Apr; 168(3):655-666. PubMed ID: 29318406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in primary invasive breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation in China.
    Cao W; Xie Y; He Y; Li J; Wang T; Fan Z; Fan T; Ouyang T
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jun; 175(3):749-754. PubMed ID: 30895535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer detection among Irish BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutation carriers: a population-based study.
    Walsh EM; Farrell MP; Nolan C; Gallagher F; Clarke R; McCaffrey JA; Kennedy MJ; Barry M; Kell MR; Gallagher DJ
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 185(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 25673166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: very low risk for subsequent breast cancer.
    Kaas R; Verhoef S; Wesseling J; Rookus MA; Oldenburg HS; Peeters MJ; Rutgers EJ
    Ann Surg; 2010 Mar; 251(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 20134318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Saadatmand S; Geuzinge HA; Rutgers EJT; Mann RM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Zonderland HM; Tollenaar RAEM; Lobbes MBI; Ausems MGEM; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Mares-Engelberts I; Luiten EJT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Verhoef C; Karssemeijer N; Oosterwijk JC; Obdeijn IM; de Koning HJ; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA;
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Aug; 20(8):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 31221620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic Impact of Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers Compared With Noncarriers in a Consecutive Series of Young Breast Cancer Patients.
    van den Broek AJ; Schmidt MK; van 't Veer LJ; Oldenburg HSA; Rutgers EJ; Russell NS; Smit VTHBM; Voogd AC; Koppert LB; Siesling S; Jobsen JJ; Westenend PJ; van Leeuwen FE; Tollenaar RAEM
    Ann Surg; 2019 Aug; 270(2):364-372. PubMed ID: 29727326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
    Griebsch I; Brown J; Boggis C; Dixon A; Dixon M; Easton D; Eeles R; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Hawnaur J; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Potterton J; Thompson D; Turnbull LW; Walker LG; Warren R; Leach MO;
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 95(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 17016484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathologic characteristics of breast parenchyma in patients with hereditary breast carcinoma, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    Adem C; Reynolds C; Soderberg CL; Slezak JM; McDonnell SK; Sebo TJ; Schaid DJ; Myers JL; Sellers TA; Hartmann LC; Jenkins RB
    Cancer; 2003 Jan; 97(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.
    Riedl CC; Luft N; Bernhart C; Weber M; Bernathova M; Tea MK; Rudas M; Singer CF; Helbich TH
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1128-35. PubMed ID: 25713430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.