These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24152377)
1. Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional analyses of facial asymmetry in adults. Alqattan M; Djordjevic J; Zhurov AI; Richmond S Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24152377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults. Huang CS; Liu XQ; Chen YR Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 23324075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facial shape and asymmetry in 5-year-old children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and/or palate: an exploratory study using laser scanning. Djordjevic J; Lewis BM; Donaghy CE; Zhurov AI; Knox J; Hunter L; Richmond S Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 23041935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison. Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning. Djordjevic J; Toma AM; Zhurov AI; Richmond S Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 21795753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Advances in determination of median sagittal plane of facial soft tissue]. Xiao N; Wang Y; Zhao YJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):495-499. PubMed ID: 29996372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison Between Interactive Closest Point and Procrustes Analysis for Determining the Median Sagittal Plane of Three-Dimensional Facial Data. Xiong Y; Zhao Y; Yang H; Sun Y; Wang Y J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):441-4. PubMed ID: 26825747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of therapeutic effect of virtual design for correcting facial asymmetry of skeletal Class Ⅲ deformity]. Tian KY; Li QQ; Liu XJ; Wang XX; Li ZL; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):594-599. PubMed ID: 27719703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry. Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis - A comparison of recent approaches. Berlin NF; Berssenbrügge P; Runte C; Wermker K; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 24041610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Tartaglia G J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Nov; 52(11):1126-32. PubMed ID: 7965306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of facial asymmetry in growing subjects with a three-dimensional laser scanning system. Primozic J; Perinetti G; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 23020694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography. Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of three methods to evaluate the position of an artificial ear on the deficient side of the face from a three-dimensional surface scan of patients with hemifacial microsomia. Coward TJ; Watson RM; Richards R; Scott BJ Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22371838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry among pre-pubertal class III subjects: a controlled study. Ovsenik M; Perinetti G; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Primozic J Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 24062380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults: Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach. Kornreich D; Mitchell AA; Webb BD; Cristian I; Jabs EW Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 25489769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry. Blasi A; Nucera R; Ronsivalle V; Candida E; Grippaudo C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 35562291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A three-dimensional study of facial mimicry in healthy young adults. Sforza C; Galante D; Shirai YF; Ferrario VF J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 19932974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]