BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24152850)

  • 1. Entero-colpo-defecography vs supine entero-MRI: which one is the best tool in the differentiation of enterocele, elytrocele and edrocele?
    Faggian A; Alabiso ME; Serra N; Pizza NL; Iasiello F; Tecame M; Somma F; Rossi C; Di Grezia G; Feragalli B; Iacomino A; Grassi R
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2013; 27(3):861-8. PubMed ID: 24152850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders.
    Cappabianca S; Reginelli A; Iacobellis F; Granata V; Urciuoli L; Alabiso ME; Di Grezia G; Marano I; Gatta G; Grassi R
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Sep; 26(9):1191-6. PubMed ID: 21538053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between dynamic cystocolpoproctography and dynamic pelvic floor MRI: pros and cons: which is the "functional" examination for anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction?
    Maglinte DD; Hale DS; Sandrasegaran K
    Abdom Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(5):952-73. PubMed ID: 22446896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography.
    Vitton V; Vignally P; Barthet M; Cohen V; Durieux O; Bouvier M; Grimaud JC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1398-404. PubMed ID: 21979185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR imaging of the pelvic floor: defecography.
    Brandão AC; Ianez P
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 May; 21(2):427-45. PubMed ID: 23642561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Comparison with conventional X-ray defecography.
    Poncelet E; Rock A; Quinton JF; Cosson M; Ramdane N; Nicolas L; Feldmann A; Salleron J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Apr; 98(4):327-332. PubMed ID: 28089181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static and dynamic evaluation of pelvic floor disorders with an open low-field tilting magnet.
    Fiaschetti V; Pastorelli D; Squillaci E; Funel V; Rascioni M; Meschini A; Salimbeni C; Sileri P; Franceschilli L; Simonetti G
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jun; 68(6):e293-300. PubMed ID: 23541093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dynamic magnetic resonance defaecography with rectal contrast and conventional defaecography for posterior pelvic floor compartment prolapse.
    van Iersel JJ; Formijne Jonkers HA; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Heggelman BG; Sreetharan V; Fütterer JJ; Somers I; van der Leest M; Consten EC
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jan; 19(1):O46-O53. PubMed ID: 27870169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Role of defecography in female posterior pelvic floor abnormalities].
    Touchais JY; Koning E; Savoye-Collet C; Leroi AM; Denis P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Dec; 35(12):1257-63. PubMed ID: 18035577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective Comparison between two different magnetic resonance defecography techniques for evaluating pelvic floor disorders: air-balloon versus gel for rectal filling.
    Maccioni F; Al Ansari N; Buonocore V; Mazzamurro F; Indinnimeo M; Mongardini M; Catalano C
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 26443600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction.
    Lalwani N; Moshiri M; Lee JH; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2013 Nov; 51(6):1127-39. PubMed ID: 24210448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: Indications, techniques and MRI features.
    Mortele KJ; Fairhurst J
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Mar; 61(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 17145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography is superior to functional pelvic MRI in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders: results of a prospective study.
    Faucheron JL; Barot S; Collomb D; Hohn N; Anglade D; Dubreuil A
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):O240-7. PubMed ID: 24506228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Dynamic MR defecography for diagnosis of combined functional disorders of the pelvic floor in proctology].
    Paetzel C; Strotzer M; Fürst A; Rentsch M; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S
    Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 11414148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The usefulness of MR defecography in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction: our experience using 3T MRI.
    Al-Najar MS; Ghanem AF; AlRyalat SAS; Al-Ryalat NT; Alhajahjeh SO
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2219-2224. PubMed ID: 28386692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of conventional radiology and MRi defecography of pelvic floor hernias.
    Reginelli A; Di Grezia G; Gatta G; Iacobellis F; Rossi C; Giganti M; Coppolino F; Brunese L
    BMC Surg; 2013; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S53. PubMed ID: 24267789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional disorders of the ano-rectal compartment of the pelvic floor: clinical and diagnostic value of dynamic MRI.
    Maccioni F
    Abdom Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(5):930-51. PubMed ID: 23090206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [MR defaecography for the diagnosis of obstructive defaecation disorders].
    Schäfer AO; Bürk J; Baumann T; Langer M
    Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Aug; 137(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 22933008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barium proctography vs magnetic resonance proctography for pelvic floor disorders: a comparative study.
    Pilkington SA; Nugent KP; Brenner J; Harris S; Clarke A; Lamparelli M; Thomas C; Tarver D
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1224-30. PubMed ID: 22251617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Gupta S; Sharma JB; Hari S; Kumar S; Roy KK; Singh N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 22678559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.